City bus services (except mixed mode) · Connecticut

Watertown Bus Maintenance Facility

Watertown, CT · ~161 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
4.8
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Watertown Bus Maintenance Facility runs at 107% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical City bus services (except mixed mode) workplace, earning a grade C.

Watertown Bus Maintenance Facility: 4.8 TCR = 107% of City bus services (except mixed mode) BLS 4.5 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Watertown Bus Maintenance Facility safety composite

Watertown Bus Maintenance Facility scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 55% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 39%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

48/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 4.8 per 100 workers

Safer than 55% of industry peers

DART rate
D 4.69 per 100 workers

Safer than 39% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Watertown Bus Maintenance Facility held a steady TCR band

Watertown Bus Maintenance Facility's TCR held near 0.3 from 5.0 in 2018 to 4.7 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 6.7 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.98× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=5.0 · 2019=5.4 · 2020=5.4 · 2021=3.2 · 2022=6.7 · 2023=3.2 · 2024=4.7

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 485113 · Watertown, CT ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 4.8 · 107% of ind

  • DART 4.7 DART
  • RANK #2/4
  • PHOTO TMR Toms
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 49 inj
  • SIZE ~161 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: TMR Toms (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Connecticut employers → · Look up another →

Watertown Bus Maintenance Facility in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Watertown Bus Maintenance Facility averages 4.8 TCR (107% of the City bus services (except mixed mode) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Watertown Bus Maintenance Facility TCR series: 2018=5 · 2019=5.4 · 2020=5.4 · 2021=3.2 · 2022=6.7 · 2023=3.2 · 2024=4.7 · BLS 4.5

Where Watertown Bus Maintenance Facility falls in its industry

332 City bus services (except mixe establishments

Safer than 55% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Connecticut alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #2 safest of 4 City bus services (except mixe employers in Connecticut.

Watertown Bus Maintenance Facility (161 employees, TCR 4.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 113 employees and a TCR of 5.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Watertown Bus Maintenance Facility
Watertown Bus Maintenance Facility (161 employees, TCR 4.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 113 employees and a TCR of 5.3

Watertown Bus Maintenance Facility has more employees than the City bus services (except mixed mode) median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 4.7 4.7 8 0 0
2023 3.2 2.6 6 0 0
2022 6.7 6.0 9 1 0
2021 3.2 3.2 6 0 0
2020 5.4 3.8 9 1 0
2019 5.4 3.3 10 0 0
2018 5.0 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

485113 · CT · Watertown

332 City bus services (except mixed mode) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,008 rated employers in Connecticut with headcount on file · 55 employers in Watertown, CT · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR TMR Toms 4.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR TRANSIT CONNECTION LLC 4.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR 480 JEFFERSON PARISH 4.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR 2662-7013 4.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE BLT Management LLC 161 FTE
STATE-SIZE KX Technologies 161 FTE
STATE-SIZE Aero Gear, Inc. 161 FTE
STATE-SIZE 100608 161 FTE
CITY-NEAR CTWAT - WATERBURY 573 FTE
CITY-NEAR WATERBURY (CTWAT) 524 FTE
CITY-NEAR Watertown Public Schools 503 FTE
CITY-NEAR Global Steering Systems 359 FTE
NAT-TCR Printflex Graphics 4.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Cubbison Company 4.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Franklin Woods Community Hospital 4.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Value Added Distributors - Shawano 4.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Southern Contracting Company 161 FTE
NAT-SIZE Zanker Road Resource Management, LLC 161 FTE
NAT-SIZE Police 161 FTE
NAT-SIZE Livermore, CA - 5699 Las Positas Road 161 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.