Couplings, mechanical power transmission, manufacturing · Wisconsin

Waukesha Bearings Corporation

Antigo, WI · ~124 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
1.7
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Waukesha Bearings Corporation runs at 52% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Couplings, mechanical power transmission, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade B.

Waukesha Bearings Corporation: 1.7 TCR = 52% of Couplings, mechanical power transmission, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Waukesha Bearings Corporation safety composite

Waukesha Bearings Corporation scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 77% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

62/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.7 per 100 workers

Safer than 77% of industry peers

DART rate
D 0.9 per 100 workers

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.2

2017→2021

Waukesha Bearings Corporation injury rate improved

Waukesha Bearings Corporation's TCR fell 2.2 from 3.1 in 2017 to 0.9 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2019 at 3.6 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0.53× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=3.1 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=3.6 · 2020=0.8 · 2021=0.9

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 333613 · Antigo, WI AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 1.7 · 52% of ind

  • DART 0.9 DART
  • RANK #5/17
  • PHOTO Martin Sprocket & Ge…
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 11 inj
  • SIZE ~124 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Martin Sprocket & Gear Arlington (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Wisconsin employers → · Look up another →

Waukesha Bearings Corporation in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Waukesha Bearings Corporation averages 1.7 TCR (52% of the Couplings, mechanical power transmission, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Waukesha Bearings Corporation TCR series: 2017=3.1 · 2018=0 · 2019=3.6 · 2020=0.8 · 2021=0.9 · BLS 3.3

Where Waukesha Bearings Corporation falls in its industry

111 Couplings, mechanical power tr establishments

Safer than 77% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Wisconsin alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #5 safest of 17 Couplings, mechanical power tr employers in Wisconsin.

Waukesha Bearings Corporation (124 employees, TCR 1.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 72 employees and a TCR of 3.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Waukesha Bearings Corporation
Waukesha Bearings Corporation (124 employees, TCR 1.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 72 employees and a TCR of 3.4

Waukesha Bearings Corporation has more employees than the Couplings, mechanical power transmission median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 0.9 0.9 1 0 0
2020 0.8 0.8 1 0 0
2019 3.6 2.2 5 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 3.1 1.6 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

333613 · WI · Antigo

111 Couplings, mechanical power transmission, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,834 rated employers in Wisconsin with headcount on file · 39 employers in Antigo, WI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Martin Sprocket & Gear Arlington 1.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Chain Milwaukee 1.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Nook Industries 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR ATR SALES, INC. 1.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Northeast Asphalt, Inc. - Appleton/Trans./QC/Mfg. 124 FTE
STATE-SIZE Wolf Industries 124 FTE
STATE-SIZE Precision Drive & Control, Inc 124 FTE
STATE-SIZE Glenn Rieder LLC 124 FTE
CITY-NEAR Aspirus Langlade Hospital 494 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 3268 270 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amron, A Division of Amtec Corp 251 FTE
CITY-NEAR 3268 232 FTE
NAT-TCR Laurel Industrial Fabric Enterprises Inc. 1.7 TCR
NAT-TCR RRS Vance 1.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Atlanta 1.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Perfection Servo Hydraulics -Batavia 1.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Building Restoration Corporation 124 FTE
NAT-SIZE Wyman Gordon Company 124 FTE
NAT-SIZE Automatic Rolls of New England 124 FTE
NAT-SIZE SBE Electrical Contracting 124 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.