Internet service providers, using own operated wired telecommunications infrastructure (e.g., cable, DSL) · Washington

Wave Division Holdings LLC LaConner

Laconner, WA · ~31 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
3.2
Avg TCR
0.7
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Wave Division Holdings LLC LaConner runs at 453% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Internet service providers, using own operated wired telecommunications infrastructure (e.g., cable, DSL) workplace, earning a grade F.

Wave Division Holdings LLC LaConner: 3.2 TCR = 453% of Internet service providers, using own operated wired telecommunications infrastructure (e.g., cable, DSL) BLS 0.7 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Wave Division Holdings LLC LaConner safety composite

Wave Division Holdings LLC LaConner scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 19%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

30/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 3.17 per 100 workers

Safer than 27% of industry peers

DART rate
F 3 per 100 workers

Safer than 19% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Wave Division Holdings LLC LaConner held a steady TCR band

Wave Division Holdings LLC LaConner's TCR held near 0.3 from 3.3 in 2019 to 3.0 in 2020. Peak filing year was 2019 at 3.3 TCR. In 2020, DART was 0.95× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2019=3.3 · 2020=3.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 517110 · Laconner, WA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 3.2 · 453% of ind

  • DART 3.0 DART
  • RANK #6/9
  • PHOTO CLARO / PRT - Roosev…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~31 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: CLARO / PRT - Roosevelt (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Washington employers → · Look up another →

Wave Division Holdings LLC LaConner in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Wave Division Holdings LLC LaConner averages 3.2 TCR (453% of the Internet service providers, using own operated wired telecommunications infrastructure (e.g., cable, DSL) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Wave Division Holdings LLC LaConner TCR series: 2019=3.3 · 2020=3 · BLS 0.7

Where Wave Division Holdings LLC LaConner falls in its industry

537 Internet service providers, us establishments

Safer than 27% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Washington alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #6 safest of 9 Internet service providers, us employers in Washington.

Wave Division Holdings LLC LaConner (31 employees, TCR 3.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 276 employees and a TCR of 1.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,000 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Wave Division Holdings LLC LaConner
Wave Division Holdings LLC LaConner (31 employees, TCR 3.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 276 employees and a TCR of 1.3

Wave Division Holdings LLC LaConner has fewer employees than the Internet service providers, using own op median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 3.0 3.0 1 0 0
2019 3.3 3.3 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

517110 · WA · Laconner

537 Internet service providers, using own operated wired telecommunications infrastructure (e.g., cable, DSL) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,147 rated employers in Washington with headcount on file · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR CLARO / PRT - Roosevelt 3.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR CLARO / PRT - Centro Operaciones Manati 3.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Telecommunications 3.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Home Telephone ILEC, LLC 3.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Freese Management LLC 31 FTE
STATE-SIZE Cleveringa Farms 31 FTE
STATE-SIZE Nespelem 31 FTE
STATE-SIZE R L Smith Logging Inc 31 FTE
CITY-NEAR Wave Division Holdings, LLC-LaConner 38 FTE
NAT-TCR MPW - Location Quebec 3.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Cooley 3.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Arrow Exterminators Midtown HSC 3.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Ft Wayne IN 90-32-45-24 3.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Foremost Farms - Greenville 31 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ace Worls Wide of Navada 31 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hillyard Minneapolis 31 FTE
NAT-SIZE Calvert City KY 31 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.