Cartons, folding (except milk), made from purchased paperboard · Michigan

W.E. Slitt Company

Three Rivers, MI · ~26 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
13.3
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

W.E. Slitt Company runs at 404% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Cartons, folding (except milk), made from purchased paperboard workplace, earning a grade F.

W.E. Slitt Company: 13.3 TCR = 404% of Cartons, folding (except milk), made from purchased paperboard BLS 3.3 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

W.E. Slitt Company safety composite

W.E. Slitt Company scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 0%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

17/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 13.34 per 100 workers

Safer than 0% of industry peers

DART rate
F 4.37 per 100 workers

Safer than 12% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

W.E. Slitt Company held a steady TCR band

W.E. Slitt Company's TCR held near 0.1 from 8.9 in 2016 to 8.7 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 27.4 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.33× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=8.9 · 2017=14.6 · 2018=8.6 · 2019=12.3 · 2020=16.4 · 2021=27.4 · 2022=11.3 · 2023=11.8 · 2024=8.7

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 322212 · Three Rivers, MI ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 13.3 · 404% of ind

  • DART 4.4 DART
  • RANK #7/7
  • PHOTO Wausau Container Cor…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 30 inj
  • SIZE ~26 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Wausau Container Corporation (0.7 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

W.E. Slitt Company in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows W.E. Slitt Company averages 13.3 TCR (404% of the Cartons, folding (except milk), made from purchased paperboard BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

W.E. Slitt Company TCR series: 2016=8.9 · 2017=14.6 · 2018=8.6 · 2019=12.3 · 2020=16.4 · 2021=27.4 · 2022=11.3 · 2023=11.8 · 2024=8.7 · BLS 3.3

Where W.E. Slitt Company falls in its industry

205 Cartons, folding (except milk) establishments

Safer than 0% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #7 safest of 7 Cartons, folding (except milk) employers in Michigan.

W.E. Slitt Company (26 employees, TCR 13.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 133 employees and a TCR of 2.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate W.E. Slitt Company
W.E. Slitt Company (26 employees, TCR 13.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 133 employees and a TCR of 2.2

W.E. Slitt Company has fewer employees than the Cartons, folding (except milk), made fro median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 8.7 4.4 2 0 0
2023 11.8 7.8 3 0 0
2022 11.3 11.3 3 0 0
2021 27.4 27.4 7 0 0
2020 16.4 12.3 4 0 0
2019 12.3 12.3 3 0 0
2018 8.6 8.6 2 0 0
2017 14.6 14.6 4 0 0
2016 8.9 8.9 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

322212 · MI · Three Rivers

205 Cartons, folding (except milk), made from purchased paperboard employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 41 employers in Three Rivers, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Wausau Container Corporation 12.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Color Craft Graphic Arts, LLC 11.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR The Standard Group LLC - KY 11.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Stone Mountain GA 10.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Walther Farms Cass City 26 FTE
STATE-SIZE United States Gypsum 26 FTE
STATE-SIZE Genesee Power Station 26 FTE
STATE-SIZE Bronson SC 26 FTE
CITY-NEAR AAM TRMF 1,280 FTE
CITY-NEAR Three Rivers Health 481 FTE
CITY-NEAR Three Rivers Hospital 302 FTE
CITY-NEAR Armstrong International - Three Rivers Division 289 FTE
NAT-TCR Security-Luebke Roofing Inc. 13.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Naylor & Breen Builders, Inc 13.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Tecumseh Plant 13.3 TCR
NAT-TCR CAN011 13.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Gene Ray Electric Co. Inc. 26 FTE
NAT-SIZE Linkletter & Sons Inc. 26 FTE
NAT-SIZE 3 Springs Water, LLC 26 FTE
NAT-SIZE M Brett Painting Company, Inc. 26 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.