Tube (e.g., heavy riveted, lock joint, seamless, welded) made from purchased iron or steel · Pennsylvania

Webco VAF

Reno, PA · ~47 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.1
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Webco VAF runs at 65% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Tube (e.g., heavy riveted, lock joint, seamless, welded) made from purchased iron or steel workplace, earning a grade B.

Webco VAF: 2.1 TCR = 65% of Tube (e.g., heavy riveted, lock joint, seamless, welded) made from purchased iron or steel BLS 3.3 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Webco VAF safety composite

Webco VAF scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 78% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 23%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

52/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 2.15 per 100 workers

Safer than 78% of industry peers

DART rate
F 4.15 per 100 workers

Safer than 23% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Webco VAF: 0.0 → 6.2 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 6.2 TCR · DART/TCR 1.93× in 2024

Webco VAF's TCR rose 6.2 from 0.0 in 2017 to 6.2 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 1.93× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 331210 · Reno, PA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 2.1 · 65% of ind

  • DART 4.2 DART
  • RANK #7/32
  • PHOTO Wilborn Steel Co., L…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 9 inj
  • SIZE ~47 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Wilborn Steel Co., Ltd. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

Webco VAF in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Webco VAF averages 2.1 TCR (65% of the Tube (e.g., heavy riveted, lock joint, seamless, welded) made from purchased iron or steel BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Webco VAF TCR series: 2017=0 · 2018=1.9 · 2019=1.9 · 2020=0 · 2021=2.1 · 2022=5 · 2023=0 · 2024=6.2 · BLS 3.3

Where Webco VAF falls in its industry

329 Tube (e.g., heavy riveted, loc establishments

Safer than 78% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #7 safest of 32 Tube (e.g., heavy riveted, loc employers in Pennsylvania.

Webco VAF (47 employees, TCR 2.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 99 employees and a TCR of 4.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Webco VAF
Webco VAF (47 employees, TCR 2.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 99 employees and a TCR of 4.3

Webco VAF has fewer employees than the Tube (e.g., heavy riveted, lock joint, s median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 6.2 4.2 3 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 5.0 1.7 3 0 0
2021 2.1 0.0 1 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 1.9 1.9 1 0 0
2018 1.9 0.0 1 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

331210 · PA · Reno

329 Tube (e.g., heavy riveted, lock joint, seamless, welded) made from purchased iron or steel employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 6 employers in Reno, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Wilborn Steel Co., Ltd. 2.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Taylor Forge Engineered Systems Greeley 2.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Independence Tube Decatur 2.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Nucor Tubular Product Inc. Decatur 2.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Dan Schantz Greenhouse (Rising Sun, MD) 47 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hillendale Services, LLC 47 FTE
STATE-SIZE Mansfield 14235 US Route 6, Mansfield, PA 16933 47 FTE
STATE-SIZE Electric Division Wilkes Barre 47 FTE
CITY-NEAR Liberty Electronics Inc - Reno 100 FTE
CITY-NEAR Klapec Trucking Company 87 FTE
CITY-NEAR Joy Global Underground Mining 81 FTE
CITY-NEAR Joy Global - Reno 69 FTE
NAT-TCR Excel Services, Inc. 2.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Dale Canfield Construction, Inc. 2.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Gerloff Company - San Antonio 2.1 TCR
NAT-TCR TMS, Inc. 2.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Cousins Furniture & Home Improvements, Corp. 47 FTE
NAT-SIZE Keson LLC 47 FTE
NAT-SIZE Marval Industries, Inc. 47 FTE
NAT-SIZE Duluth 47 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.