Central air-conditioning equipment installation · New York

Weber and Grahn Conditioning Corp.

Hampton Bays, NY · ~74 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
2.6
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Weber and Grahn Conditioning Corp. runs at 95% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Central air-conditioning equipment installation workplace, earning a grade C.

Weber and Grahn Conditioning Corp.: 2.6 TCR = 95% of Central air-conditioning equipment installation BLS 2.8 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Weber and Grahn Conditioning Corp. safety composite

Weber and Grahn Conditioning Corp. scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 80% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

64/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.65 per 100 workers

Safer than 58% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 80% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Weber and Grahn Conditioning Corp. held a steady TCR band

Weber and Grahn Conditioning Corp.'s TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 7.0 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=0.0 · 2020=7.0 · 2021=4.0 · 2022=2.6 · 2023=2.2 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238220 · Hampton Bays, NY AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 2.6 · 95% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #126/297
  • PHOTO McClure-Wilkes Barre
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 10 inj
  • SIZE ~74 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: McClure-Wilkes Barre (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New York employers → · Look up another →

Weber and Grahn Conditioning Corp. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Weber and Grahn Conditioning Corp. averages 2.6 TCR (95% of the Central air-conditioning equipment installation BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Weber and Grahn Conditioning Corp. TCR series: 2016=0 · 2020=7 · 2021=4 · 2022=2.6 · 2023=2.2 · 2024=0 · BLS 2.8

Where Weber and Grahn Conditioning Corp. falls in its industry

5,793 Central air-conditioning equip establishments

Safer than 58% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New York alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #126 safest of 297 Central air-conditioning equip employers in New York.

Weber and Grahn Conditioning Corp. (74 employees, TCR 2.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 60 employees and a TCR of 3.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Weber and Grahn Conditioning Corp.
Weber and Grahn Conditioning Corp. (74 employees, TCR 2.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 60 employees and a TCR of 3.3

Weber and Grahn Conditioning Corp. has more employees than the Central air-conditioning equipment insta median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 2.2 2.2 2 0 0
2022 2.6 2.6 2 0 0
2021 4.0 4.0 3 0 0
2020 7.0 5.3 3 1 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238220 · NY · Hampton Bays

5,793 Central air-conditioning equipment installation employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 21,008 rated employers in New York with headcount on file · 15 employers in Hampton Bays, NY · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR McClure-Wilkes Barre 2.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Mesa - Reno 2.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Pleune Service Division 2.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Advanced Heating and Cooling Utah LLC 2.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE BENNETT CONTRACTING II, LLC 74 FTE
STATE-SIZE Henegan Construction Co., Inc. 74 FTE
STATE-SIZE GAP Leasing Inc. 74 FTE
STATE-SIZE Connors Haas Inc. 74 FTE
CITY-NEAR 102551 126 FTE
CITY-NEAR STOP & SHOP 2551 111 FTE
CITY-NEAR Canoe Place Inn & Cottages 88 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hampton Bays 171 86 FTE
NAT-TCR SD 2.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Schupan Industrial Recycling Elkhart 2.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Vehma International 2.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Location 3 2.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Orchard Pointe Health Campus 74 FTE
NAT-SIZE Furtmann Bros LLC 74 FTE
NAT-SIZE Bangor 74 FTE
NAT-SIZE Pioneer Coach, LLC 74 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.