Boxes, corrugated and solid fiber, made from purchased paper or paperboard · Indiana

Welch Packaging Indianapolis

Indianapolis, IN · ~98 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.4
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Welch Packaging Indianapolis runs at 103% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Boxes, corrugated and solid fiber, made from purchased paper or paperboard workplace, earning a grade C.

Welch Packaging Indianapolis: 3.4 TCR = 103% of Boxes, corrugated and solid fiber, made from purchased paper or paperboard BLS 3.3 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Welch Packaging Indianapolis safety composite

Welch Packaging Indianapolis scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 10%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

29/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 3.4 per 100 workers

Safer than 32% of industry peers

DART rate
F 5.11 per 100 workers

Safer than 10% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Welch Packaging Indianapolis: 0.0 → 10.2 TCR

Peak year 2021 @ 10.2 TCR · DART/TCR 1.5× in 2021

Welch Packaging Indianapolis's TCR rose 10.2 from 0.0 in 2018 to 10.2 in 2021. In 2021, DART was 1.5× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 322211 · Indianapolis, IN ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 3.4 · 103% of ind

  • DART 5.1 DART
  • RANK #49/67
  • PHOTO OH201 West Chester -…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 6 inj
  • SIZE ~98 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: OH201 West Chester - Trey (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Indiana employers → · Look up another →

Welch Packaging Indianapolis in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Welch Packaging Indianapolis averages 3.4 TCR (103% of the Boxes, corrugated and solid fiber, made from purchased paper or paperboard BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Welch Packaging Indianapolis TCR series: 2018=0 · 2019=0 · 2021=10.2 · BLS 3.3

Where Welch Packaging Indianapolis falls in its industry

1,338 Boxes, corrugated and solid fi establishments

Safer than 32% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Indiana alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #49 safest of 67 Boxes, corrugated and solid fi employers in Indiana.

Welch Packaging Indianapolis (98 employees, TCR 3.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 102 employees and a TCR of 2.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0123456 Average employees Total Case Rate Welch Packaging Indianapolis
Welch Packaging Indianapolis (98 employees, TCR 3.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 102 employees and a TCR of 2.4

Welch Packaging Indianapolis has fewer employees than the Boxes, corrugated and solid fiber, made median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 10.2 5.1 6 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

322211 · IN · Indianapolis

1,338 Boxes, corrugated and solid fiber, made from purchased paper or paperboard employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,750 rated employers in Indiana with headcount on file · 2,074 employers in Indianapolis, IN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR OH201 West Chester - Trey 3.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR BCI Koch Division 3.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR International Paper 3.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Pratt (Love Box) LLC 3.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Logansport Utilites 98 FTE
STATE-SIZE Pemberton Davis Electric 98 FTE
STATE-SIZE American Beverage Marketers 98 FTE
STATE-SIZE House of Fara, Inc 98 FTE
CITY-NEAR Indiana University Health, Inc 7,874 FTE
CITY-NEAR Methodist Hospital 6,862 FTE
CITY-NEAR Eli Lilly - Lilly Corp Center 6,482 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lilly Technology Center 6,472 FTE
NAT-TCR RGS Products Inc 3.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Fairfield - OBH 3.4 TCR
NAT-TCR E&S Precision Machine, Inc. 3.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Progressive Roofing Inc 3.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Perfection Servo Hydraulics -Batavia 98 FTE
NAT-SIZE Johnson Health Tech Retail Inc 98 FTE
NAT-SIZE Tate Access Floors - Headquarters 98 FTE
NAT-SIZE Progress Glass Co., Inc. 98 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.