Architectural wall panels, precast concrete, manufacturing · Minnesota

Wells Concrete - Rosemount

Rosemount, MN · ~47 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
6.6
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Wells Concrete - Rosemount runs at 201% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Architectural wall panels, precast concrete, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade F.

Wells Concrete - Rosemount: 6.6 TCR = 201% of Architectural wall panels, precast concrete, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Wells Concrete - Rosemount safety composite

Wells Concrete - Rosemount scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 83% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 32%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

55/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 6.62 per 100 workers

Safer than 32% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 83% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−11.8

2018→2023

Wells Concrete - Rosemount injury rate improved

Wells Concrete - Rosemount's TCR fell 11.8 from 11.8 in 2018 to 0.0 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2018 at 11.8 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=11.8 · 2019=7.0 · 2020=7.8 · 2021=6.5 · 2023=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 327390 · Rosemount, MN ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 6.6 · 201% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #11/21
  • PHOTO Georgia Precast Solu…
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 14 inj
  • SIZE ~47 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Georgia Precast Solutions, LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Wells Concrete - Rosemount in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Wells Concrete - Rosemount averages 6.6 TCR (201% of the Architectural wall panels, precast concrete, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Wells Concrete - Rosemount TCR series: 2018=11.8 · 2019=7 · 2020=7.8 · 2021=6.5 · 2023=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Wells Concrete - Rosemount falls in its industry

790 Architectural wall panels, pre establishments

Safer than 32% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #11 safest of 21 Architectural wall panels, pre employers in Minnesota.

Wells Concrete - Rosemount (47 employees, TCR 6.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 52 employees and a TCR of 4.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Wells Concrete - Rosemount
Wells Concrete - Rosemount (47 employees, TCR 6.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 52 employees and a TCR of 4.6

Wells Concrete - Rosemount has fewer employees than the Architectural wall panels, precast concr median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 6.5 6.5 3 0 0
2020 7.8 3.9 4 0 0
2019 7.0 2.4 3 0 0
2018 11.8 9.4 4 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

327390 · MN · Rosemount

790 Architectural wall panels, precast concrete, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 60 employers in Rosemount, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Georgia Precast Solutions, LLC 6.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR MPC Enterprises Inc 6.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Mack Industries of PA 6.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Sexton Wilbert Corp 6.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Staples 47 FTE
STATE-SIZE Campbell 47 FTE
STATE-SIZE Willmar Live Haul 47 FTE
STATE-SIZE Mille Lacs Energy Cooperative 47 FTE
CITY-NEAR Independent School District 196 4,172 FTE
CITY-NEAR Flint Hills Resources 1,006 FTE
CITY-NEAR Flint Hills Resources Pine Bend, LLC 905 FTE
CITY-NEAR ISD 917 Rosemount 559 FTE
NAT-TCR Bluff View Homes 6.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Wonton Food Inc Bean Sprout Plainview 6.6 TCR
NAT-TCR City of Modesto 6.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Accurate Pattern, Inc 6.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Heritage at The Plains at Parish Homestead 47 FTE
NAT-SIZE Endeavor Air, Inc. - DSM Tech Ops 47 FTE
NAT-SIZE Dakota Molding, Inc. 47 FTE
NAT-SIZE Newco Construction of America, Inc. 47 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.