Managing commercial real estate · North Carolina

Wells Fargo CIC Management Office

Charlotte, NC · ~30 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
4.0
Avg TCR
1.4
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Wells Fargo CIC Management Office runs at 284% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Managing commercial real estate workplace, earning a grade F.

Wells Fargo CIC Management Office: 4.0 TCR = 284% of Managing commercial real estate BLS 1.4 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Wells Fargo CIC Management Office safety composite

Wells Fargo CIC Management Office scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 71% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 35%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

51/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 3.98 per 100 workers

Safer than 35% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 71% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Wells Fargo CIC Management Office held a steady TCR band

Wells Fargo CIC Management Office's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2019 to 0.0 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2022 at 11.4 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2019=0.0 · 2020=5.4 · 2021=3.0 · 2022=11.4 · 2023=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 531312 · Charlotte, NC ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 4.0 · 284% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #13/16
  • PHOTO Biltmore Farms Hotels
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 7 inj
  • SIZE ~30 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Biltmore Farms Hotels (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Wells Fargo CIC Management Office in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Wells Fargo CIC Management Office averages 4.0 TCR (284% of the Managing commercial real estate BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Wells Fargo CIC Management Office TCR series: 2019=0 · 2020=5.4 · 2021=3 · 2022=11.4 · 2023=0 · BLS 1.4

Where Wells Fargo CIC Management Office falls in its industry

183 Managing commercial real estat establishments

Safer than 35% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #13 safest of 16 Managing commercial real estat employers in North Carolina.

Wells Fargo CIC Management Office (30 employees, TCR 4.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 46 employees and a TCR of 2.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Wells Fargo CIC Management Office
Wells Fargo CIC Management Office (30 employees, TCR 4.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 46 employees and a TCR of 2.8

Wells Fargo CIC Management Office has fewer employees than the Managing commercial real estate median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 11.4 8.6 4 0 0
2021 3.0 3.0 1 0 0
2020 5.4 5.4 2 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

531312 · NC · Charlotte

183 Managing commercial real estate employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 2,058 employers in Charlotte, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Biltmore Farms Hotels 4.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Ala Moana Center 3.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Total Commercial Real Estate, Inc. 3.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Carolina PLace 4.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Shugart Farm 30 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hays Hatchery 30 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hight Family Farms LLC 30 FTE
STATE-SIZE High Point Operations Center 30 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1101-Carolinas Medical Center (1101) 8,444 FTE
CITY-NEAR 0001-Carolinas Medical Center 8,032 FTE
CITY-NEAR 4795-AA-CLT-CHARLOTTE-CLT-TRML 7,295 FTE
CITY-NEAR Novant Health Presbyterian Medical Center 4,973 FTE
NAT-TCR 4001 Misericordia University 4.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Columbus NW Svc Ctr 4.0 TCR
NAT-TCR 55424 Houston Fixed Route 4.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Cohen Florence Levine Estates 4.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE 1073 Dubois Area School District 30 FTE
NAT-SIZE 2064 Chick fil A at Mohegan Sun Casino 30 FTE
NAT-SIZE 1551 Mt Laurel SD 30 FTE
NAT-SIZE 01-Pittsburgh 30 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.