Other Support Activities for Road Transportation · Arizona

Werner Enterprises/PHOAZ Terminal

Phoenix, AZ · ~46 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
5.9
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Werner Enterprises/PHOAZ Terminal runs at 132% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Other Support Activities for Road Transportation workplace, earning a grade D.

Werner Enterprises/PHOAZ Terminal: 5.9 TCR = 132% of Other Support Activities for Road Transportation BLS 4.5 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Werner Enterprises/PHOAZ Terminal safety composite

Werner Enterprises/PHOAZ Terminal scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 18%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

33/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 5.93 per 100 workers

Safer than 36% of industry peers

DART rate
F 7.4 per 100 workers

Safer than 18% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Werner Enterprises/PHOAZ Terminal: 2.0 → 9.9 TCR

Peak year 2021 @ 9.9 TCR · DART/TCR 1.25× in 2021

Werner Enterprises/PHOAZ Terminal's TCR rose 7.8 from 2.0 in 2016 to 9.9 in 2021. In 2021, DART was 1.25× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 488490 · Phoenix, AZ ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 5.9 · 132% of ind

  • DART 7.4 DART
  • RANK #4/5
  • PHOTO Online Transport Fai…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 11 inj
  • SIZE ~46 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Online Transport Fairmont WV Domicile (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Arizona employers → · Look up another →

Werner Enterprises/PHOAZ Terminal in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Werner Enterprises/PHOAZ Terminal averages 5.9 TCR (132% of the Other Support Activities for Road Transportation BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Werner Enterprises/PHOAZ Terminal TCR series: 2016=2 · 2018=9.8 · 2020=2 · 2021=9.9 · BLS 4.5

Where Werner Enterprises/PHOAZ Terminal falls in its industry

370 Other Support Activities for R establishments

Safer than 36% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Arizona alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #4 safest of 5 Other Support Activities for R employers in Arizona.

Werner Enterprises/PHOAZ Terminal (46 employees, TCR 5.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 51 employees and a TCR of 4.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Werner Enterprises/PHOAZ Terminal
Werner Enterprises/PHOAZ Terminal (46 employees, TCR 5.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 51 employees and a TCR of 4.4

Werner Enterprises/PHOAZ Terminal has fewer employees than the Other Support Activities for Road Transp median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 9.9 7.4 4 0 0
2020 2.0 2.0 1 0 0
2018 9.8 5.9 5 0 0
2016 2.0 2.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

488490 · AZ · Phoenix

370 Other Support Activities for Road Transportation employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 9,594 rated employers in Arizona with headcount on file · 2,630 employers in Phoenix, AZ · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Online Transport Fairmont WV Domicile 5.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Home Depot 5642 6.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Nestle (305/405) - Breinigsville, PA 6.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Jacksonville Greyhound Bus Terminal 6.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Utilities - Oasis WTP 46 FTE
STATE-SIZE Fountain Hills Sanitary District 46 FTE
STATE-SIZE SBF Foxfire 46 FTE
STATE-SIZE Pulte Development Corporation, Festival Ranch 46 FTE
CITY-NEAR Maricopa County 15,504 FTE
CITY-NEAR Phoenix Children's Hospital 7,575 FTE
CITY-NEAR All Company 6,261 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6403-64030500 6,153 FTE
NAT-TCR Staples Brighton FC 4807 5.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Dynametal 5.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Spancrete Valders 5.9 TCR
NAT-TCR MFG Energy Services 5.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Shiawassee County Road Commission 46 FTE
NAT-SIZE The Dalles Health & Rehabilitation Center 46 FTE
NAT-SIZE LEI Companies, Inc. 46 FTE
NAT-SIZE St Clair Winery & Bistro 1, LLC 46 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.