Rubbish (i.e., nonhazardous solid waste) hauling, local · Minnesota

West Central Sanitation

Willmar, MN · ~110 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
2.7
Avg TCR
2.6
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

West Central Sanitation runs at 105% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Rubbish (i.e., nonhazardous solid waste) hauling, local workplace, earning a grade C.

West Central Sanitation: 2.7 TCR = 105% of Rubbish (i.e., nonhazardous solid waste) hauling, local BLS 2.6 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

West Central Sanitation safety composite

West Central Sanitation scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 78% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 52%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

70/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 2.74 per 100 workers

Safer than 78% of industry peers

DART rate
C 1.28 per 100 workers

Safer than 73% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−7.9

2017→2024

West Central Sanitation injury rate improved

West Central Sanitation's TCR fell 7.9 from 9.2 in 2017 to 1.3 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2017 at 9.2 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.47× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=9.2 · 2020=0.2 · 2021=3.3 · 2022=2.5 · 2023=0.1 · 2024=1.3

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 562111 · Willmar, MN ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 2.7 · 105% of ind

  • DART 1.3 DART
  • RANK #13/60
  • PHOTO S04078 - Winston-Sal…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 24 inj
  • SIZE ~110 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: S04078 - Winston-Salem Hauling (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

West Central Sanitation in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows West Central Sanitation averages 2.7 TCR (105% of the Rubbish (i.e., nonhazardous solid waste) hauling, local BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

West Central Sanitation TCR series: 2017=9.2 · 2020=0.2 · 2021=3.3 · 2022=2.5 · 2023=0.1 · 2024=1.3 · BLS 2.6

Where West Central Sanitation falls in its industry

2,322 Rubbish (i.e., nonhazardous so establishments

Safer than 78% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #13 safest of 60 Rubbish (i.e., nonhazardous so employers in Minnesota.

West Central Sanitation (110 employees, TCR 2.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 5.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate West Central Sanitation
West Central Sanitation (110 employees, TCR 2.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 5.1

West Central Sanitation has more employees than the Rubbish (i.e., nonhazardous solid waste) median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.3 1.3 2 0 0
2023 0.1 0.1 1 0 0
2022 2.5 2.5 3 0 0
2021 3.3 1.6 4 0 0
2020 0.2 0.2 3 0 0
2017 9.2 4.6 11 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

562111 · MN · Willmar

2,322 Rubbish (i.e., nonhazardous solid waste) hauling, local employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 154 employers in Willmar, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR S04078 - Winston-Salem Hauling 2.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR 602 - Meridian 2.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Hometown Waste LLC 2.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR S02952 - WM - Volusia 2.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Cargill Animal Nutrition Innovation Campus 110 FTE
STATE-SIZE Minneapolis SE Storage 110 FTE
STATE-SIZE Shaw-Lundquist Associates Inc. 110 FTE
STATE-SIZE All Energy Solar - MN 110 FTE
CITY-NEAR Willmar Avenue Plant 1,205 FTE
CITY-NEAR Willmar Ave Plant 1,096 FTE
CITY-NEAR Carris Health Rice Hospital 848 FTE
CITY-NEAR CentraCare Rice Memorial Hospital 742 FTE
NAT-TCR Fargo 140 2.7 TCR
NAT-TCR TB Control Clinic 2.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Tom Waddell Health Center 2.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Vortex Colorado - FTW 2.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Cincinnati 062 110 FTE
NAT-SIZE Seattle Cruise 110 FTE
NAT-SIZE Southern Recycling LLC New Orleans 110 FTE
NAT-SIZE Gilbane Building Company Concord 110 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.