Collection, treatment, and disposal of waste through a sewer system · California

West Valley Sanitation District

Campbell, CA · ~28 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
7.0
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

West Valley Sanitation District runs at 581% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Collection, treatment, and disposal of waste through a sewer system workplace, earning a grade F.

West Valley Sanitation District: 7.0 TCR = 581% of Collection, treatment, and disposal of waste through a sewer system BLS 1.2 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

West Valley Sanitation District safety composite

West Valley Sanitation District scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 27%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

34/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 6.97 per 100 workers

Safer than 30% of industry peers

DART rate
F 4.48 per 100 workers

Safer than 27% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

West Valley Sanitation District: 12.5 → 13.4 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 13.4 TCR · DART/TCR 0.64× in 2024

West Valley Sanitation District's TCR rose 0.9 from 12.5 in 2018 to 13.4 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 0.64× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221320 · Campbell, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 7.0 · 581% of ind

  • DART 4.5 DART
  • RANK #52/74
  • PHOTO Operations and Maint…
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 4 inj
  • SIZE ~28 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Operations and Maintenance (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

West Valley Sanitation District in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows West Valley Sanitation District averages 7.0 TCR (581% of the Collection, treatment, and disposal of waste through a sewer system BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

West Valley Sanitation District TCR series: 2018=12.5 · 2019=0 · 2022=8.9 · 2023=0 · 2024=13.4 · BLS 1.2

Where West Valley Sanitation District falls in its industry

400 Collection, treatment, and dis establishments

Safer than 30% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #52 safest of 74 Collection, treatment, and dis employers in California.

West Valley Sanitation District (28 employees, TCR 7.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 47 employees and a TCR of 4.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate West Valley Sanitation District
West Valley Sanitation District (28 employees, TCR 7.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 47 employees and a TCR of 4.4

West Valley Sanitation District has fewer employees than the Collection, treatment, and disposal of w median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 13.4 4.5 0 3 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 8.9 8.9 1 1 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 12.5 4.2 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221320 · CA · Campbell

400 Collection, treatment, and disposal of waste through a sewer system employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 87 employers in Campbell, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Operations and Maintenance 7.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR H2O innovation Operation & Maintenance LLC - Gulfport O&M 7.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Kankakee River Metropolitan Agency 7.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR OCSD Plant 2 7.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Davis Ranch L.L.C. 28 FTE
STATE-SIZE Steinbeck Country Produce 28 FTE
STATE-SIZE Harlan Family Ranch 28 FTE
STATE-SIZE KKG Equipment Company, LLC32 28 FTE
CITY-NEAR LARGO CONCRETE, INC. 599 FTE
CITY-NEAR Daley's Drywall and Taping 503 FTE
CITY-NEAR West Valley Construction Inc. 496 FTE
CITY-NEAR Life Services Alternatives 245 FTE
NAT-TCR Towerlight on Woodale 7.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Mohig - Higginsville 7.0 TCR
NAT-TCR 20751 Champlin 7.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Precision Metal Fab, LLC 7.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Circle X Land & Cattle Co., Ltd. 28 FTE
NAT-SIZE City of Eldorado Fire Department 28 FTE
NAT-SIZE Austin TX Showroom 28 FTE
NAT-SIZE Craftsman Painters & Decorators, Inc 28 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.