Mechanical rubber goods (i.e., extruded, lathe-cut, molded) manufacturing · Indiana

Western Consolidated Technologies

Fremont, IN · ~64 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
5.5
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Western Consolidated Technologies runs at 165% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Mechanical rubber goods (i.e., extruded, lathe-cut, molded) manufacturing workplace, earning a grade D.

Western Consolidated Technologies: 5.5 TCR = 165% of Mechanical rubber goods (i.e., extruded, lathe-cut, molded) manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Western Consolidated Technologies safety composite

Western Consolidated Technologies scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 29%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

42/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 5.45 per 100 workers

Safer than 29% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.75 per 100 workers

Safer than 49% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Western Consolidated Technologies: 6.9 → 8.8 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 8.8 TCR · DART/TCR 0.32× in 2024

Western Consolidated Technologies's TCR rose 1.9 from 6.9 in 2017 to 8.8 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 0.32× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 326291 · Fremont, IN ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 5.5 · 165% of ind

  • DART 1.8 DART
  • RANK #14/20
  • PHOTO GRIFFITH RUBBER MILLS
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 21 inj
  • SIZE ~64 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: GRIFFITH RUBBER MILLS (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Indiana employers → · Look up another →

Western Consolidated Technologies in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Western Consolidated Technologies averages 5.5 TCR (165% of the Mechanical rubber goods (i.e., extruded, lathe-cut, molded) manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Western Consolidated Technologies TCR series: 2017=6.9 · 2018=8.2 · 2019=5 · 2021=3.8 · 2023=0 · 2024=8.8 · BLS 3.3

Where Western Consolidated Technologies falls in its industry

266 Mechanical rubber goods (i.e., establishments

Safer than 29% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Indiana alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #14 safest of 20 Mechanical rubber goods (i.e., employers in Indiana.

Western Consolidated Technologies (64 employees, TCR 5.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 81 employees and a TCR of 3.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Western Consolidated Technologies
Western Consolidated Technologies (64 employees, TCR 5.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 81 employees and a TCR of 3.6

Western Consolidated Technologies has fewer employees than the Mechanical rubber goods (i.e., extruded, median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 8.8 1.8 5 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 3.8 3.8 2 0 0
2019 5.0 3.3 3 0 0
2018 8.2 4.1 6 0 0
2017 6.9 4.1 5 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

326291 · IN · Fremont

266 Mechanical rubber goods (i.e., extruded, lathe-cut, molded) manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,750 rated employers in Indiana with headcount on file · 28 employers in Fremont, IN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR GRIFFITH RUBBER MILLS 5.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Northern Prairie Polymers, LLC dba Industrial Molded Rubber Products 5.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR PML Inc 5.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Calumet 5.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Corporate Office 64 FTE
STATE-SIZE Phend & Brown, Inc. 64 FTE
STATE-SIZE Central Division 64 FTE
STATE-SIZE Cincinnati 64 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cardinal IG - Fremont IG 305 FTE
CITY-NEAR Fremont IG 290 FTE
CITY-NEAR Dexter Axle Company - Plant 12 250 FTE
CITY-NEAR FRE 192 FTE
NAT-TCR CIVEMPCO - Elan Manatee, LLC 5.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Harvest International Inc 5.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Aaa Admin 5.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Atlanta Rod and Manufacturing 5.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE V&S Detroit Galvanizing LLC 64 FTE
NAT-SIZE Xanitos EVS at Good Samaritan Medical Center 64 FTE
NAT-SIZE Lancaster Metal Manufacturing, LLC 64 FTE
NAT-SIZE Abraham Global Ventures Inc 64 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2021, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.