Electric and electronic controllers, industrial process-type, manufacturing · New Jersey

Westlock Controls

Saddle Brook, NJ · ~76 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.7
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Westlock Controls runs at 22% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Electric and electronic controllers, industrial process-type, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Westlock Controls: 0.7 TCR = 22% of Electric and electronic controllers, industrial process-type, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Westlock Controls safety composite

Westlock Controls scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 75% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

69/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 0.74 per 100 workers

Safer than 75% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 75% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.3

2016→2024

Westlock Controls injury rate improved

Westlock Controls's TCR fell 1.3 from 1.3 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 1.6 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=1.3 · 2017=0.0 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=1.5 · 2020=1.6 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=1.5 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 334513 · Saddle Brook, NJ AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.7 · 22% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #4/10
  • PHOTO Eagle Research Corpo…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~76 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Eagle Research Corporation (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New Jersey employers → · Look up another →

Westlock Controls in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Westlock Controls averages 0.7 TCR (22% of the Electric and electronic controllers, industrial process-type, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Westlock Controls TCR series: 2016=1.3 · 2017=0 · 2018=0 · 2019=1.5 · 2020=1.6 · 2022=0 · 2023=1.5 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Westlock Controls falls in its industry

322 Electric and electronic contro establishments

Safer than 75% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New Jersey alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #4 safest of 10 Electric and electronic contro employers in New Jersey.

Westlock Controls (76 employees, TCR 0.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 96 employees and a TCR of 1.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 02468 Average employees Total Case Rate Westlock Controls
Westlock Controls (76 employees, TCR 0.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 96 employees and a TCR of 1.3

Westlock Controls has fewer employees than the Electric and electronic controllers, ind median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 1.5 1.5 1 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 1.6 0.0 1 0 0
2019 1.5 0.0 0 1 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 1.3 1.3 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

334513 · NJ · Saddle Brook

322 Electric and electronic controllers, industrial process-type, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 11,201 rated employers in New Jersey with headcount on file · 36 employers in Saddle Brook, NJ · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Eagle Research Corporation 0.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR HORIBA Subsidiary INC-ANN ARBOR MI 0.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Fireye, Inc 0.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR 2967-PA40 0.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE New Jersey American Water-Shrewsbury 76 FTE
STATE-SIZE Union, NJ HVAC 76 FTE
STATE-SIZE The Gillespie Group, Inc. 76 FTE
STATE-SIZE American Custom Drying 76 FTE
CITY-NEAR NJSAD - SADDLE BROOK 1,355 FTE
CITY-NEAR SADDLE BROOK (NJSAD) 1,234 FTE
CITY-NEAR Kessler Institute for Rehabilitation - Saddle Brook (North) 472 FTE
CITY-NEAR Kessler Institute for Rehabilitation - Saddle Brook 444 FTE
NAT-TCR Mark Thomas Co 0.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Churchill Elementary School 0.7 TCR
NAT-TCR EI001 - Central Office 0.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Crown ERAM 0.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Palos South Middle School 76 FTE
NAT-SIZE Trader Joe's 0139 Everett 76 FTE
NAT-SIZE Trader Joe's 0224 San Diego 76 FTE
NAT-SIZE Trader Joe's 0718 Rochester 76 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.