HVAC (heating, ventilation and air-conditioning) contractors · Pennsylvania

W.F. Smith, Inc.

Philadelphia, PA · ~33 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
6.8
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

W.F. Smith, Inc. runs at 244% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical HVAC (heating, ventilation and air-conditioning) contractors workplace, earning a grade F.

W.F. Smith, Inc.: 6.8 TCR = 244% of HVAC (heating, ventilation and air-conditioning) contractors BLS 2.8 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

W.F. Smith, Inc. safety composite

W.F. Smith, Inc. scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 15%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

27/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 6.82 per 100 workers

Safer than 22% of industry peers

DART rate
F 5.29 per 100 workers

Safer than 15% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

W.F. Smith, Inc.: 3.3 → 5.3 TCR

Peak year 2018 @ 11.9 TCR · DART/TCR 0.78× in 2019

W.F. Smith, Inc.'s TCR rose 2.0 from 3.3 in 2016 to 5.3 in 2019. Peak filing year was 2018 at 11.9 TCR. In 2019, DART was 0.78× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238220 · Philadelphia, PA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 6.8 · 244% of ind

  • DART 5.3 DART
  • RANK #201/268
  • PHOTO Biagi Plumbing Corpo…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 7 inj
  • SIZE ~33 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Biagi Plumbing Corporation (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

W.F. Smith, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows W.F. Smith, Inc. averages 6.8 TCR (244% of the HVAC (heating, ventilation and air-conditioning) contractors BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

W.F. Smith, Inc. TCR series: 2016=3.3 · 2018=11.9 · 2019=5.3 · BLS 2.8

Where W.F. Smith, Inc. falls in its industry

5,793 HVAC (heating, ventilation and establishments

Safer than 22% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #201 safest of 268 HVAC (heating, ventilation and employers in Pennsylvania.

W.F. Smith, Inc. (33 employees, TCR 6.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 60 employees and a TCR of 3.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate W.F. Smith, Inc.
W.F. Smith, Inc. (33 employees, TCR 6.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 60 employees and a TCR of 3.3

W.F. Smith, Inc. has fewer employees than the HVAC (heating, ventilation and air-condi median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2019 5.3 5.3 2 0 0
2018 11.9 5.9 4 0 0
2016 3.3 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238220 · PA · Philadelphia

5,793 HVAC (heating, ventilation and air-conditioning) contractors employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 1,431 employers in Philadelphia, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Biagi Plumbing Corporation 6.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Piper Fire Protection Inc Sarasota 6.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR PRMS, LLC D/B/A 2nd Wind Heating and Air 6.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Rodenhiser Home Services 6.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Caputo & Guest 33 FTE
STATE-SIZE Colver Power Project 33 FTE
STATE-SIZE Oil City 33 FTE
STATE-SIZE Norristown Operations 33 FTE
CITY-NEAR FIVE BELOW INC 19,600 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hospital of University of Pennsylvania 13,423 FTE
CITY-NEAR Children's Hospital of Philadelphia - Main Hospital 9,638 FTE
CITY-NEAR The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia - Main Campus 9,129 FTE
NAT-TCR Brunson Nichols Construction Co Inc 6.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Somerwoods Nursing and Rehabilitation Center 6.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Kenwal Steel Corp 6.8 TCR
NAT-TCR The Sheridan at Cooper City 6.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE St. Pierre Manufacturing Corporation, Inc. 33 FTE
NAT-SIZE Wofford College Terrier Grounds Starbucks ** 33 FTE
NAT-SIZE Shaker Heights City Schools (Cleveland 33 FTE
NAT-SIZE Enoplastic USA, Inc 33 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.