Food machinery repair and maintenance services · Georgia

Whaley Foodservice-Savannah

Savannah, GA · ~20 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
6.7
Avg TCR
2.1
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Whaley Foodservice-Savannah runs at 320% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Food machinery repair and maintenance services workplace, earning a grade F.

Whaley Foodservice-Savannah: 6.7 TCR = 320% of Food machinery repair and maintenance services BLS 2.1 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Whaley Foodservice-Savannah safety composite

Whaley Foodservice-Savannah scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 11%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

22/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 6.72 per 100 workers

Safer than 11% of industry peers

DART rate
F 4.71 per 100 workers

Safer than 13% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−10.0

2016→2024

Whaley Foodservice-Savannah injury rate improved

Whaley Foodservice-Savannah's TCR fell 10.0 from 14.7 in 2016 to 4.7 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2016 at 14.7 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.7× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=14.7 · 2017=0.0 · 2018=5.2 · 2019=5.0 · 2020=12.8 · 2022=11.4 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=4.7

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 811310 · Savannah, GA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 6.7 · 320% of ind

  • DART 4.7 DART
  • RANK #84/93
  • PHOTO Michigan Cat Regiona…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 9 inj
  • SIZE ~20 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Michigan Cat Regional Field Service (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Georgia employers → · Look up another →

Whaley Foodservice-Savannah in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Whaley Foodservice-Savannah averages 6.7 TCR (320% of the Food machinery repair and maintenance services BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Whaley Foodservice-Savannah TCR series: 2016=14.7 · 2017=0 · 2018=5.2 · 2019=5 · 2020=12.8 · 2022=11.4 · 2023=0 · 2024=4.7 · BLS 2.1

Where Whaley Foodservice-Savannah falls in its industry

2,560 Food machinery repair and main establishments

Safer than 11% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Georgia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #84 safest of 93 Food machinery repair and main employers in Georgia.

Whaley Foodservice-Savannah (20 employees, TCR 6.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 2.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Whaley Foodservice-Savannah
Whaley Foodservice-Savannah (20 employees, TCR 6.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 2.7

Whaley Foodservice-Savannah has fewer employees than the Food machinery repair and maintenance se median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 4.7 4.7 1 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 11.4 11.4 2 0 0
2020 12.8 0.0 2 0 0
2019 5.0 5.0 1 0 0
2018 5.2 5.2 1 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 14.7 14.7 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

811310 · GA · Savannah

2,560 Food machinery repair and maintenance services employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 14,941 rated employers in Georgia with headcount on file · 511 employers in Savannah, GA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Michigan Cat Regional Field Service 6.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR CFM-MA-SRV 6.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR CLC Washington & Oregon 6.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Alfa Laval Inc. Frank Mohn (loc code: FRANKM) 6.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Cal-Maine foods St George 20 FTE
STATE-SIZE Lab 20 FTE
STATE-SIZE FUNSTON GIN 20 FTE
STATE-SIZE Pennington Seed - Seed Production Division (SPI) 20 FTE
CITY-NEAR Gulfstream Aerospace 13,245 FTE
CITY-NEAR Memorial Health University Medical Center 3,186 FTE
CITY-NEAR Savannah College of Art and Design 2,369 FTE
CITY-NEAR Memorial Health University Medical 2,056 FTE
NAT-TCR Boyce Highlands, Inc. 6.7 TCR
NAT-TCR York County Fire Department 6.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Central Service Center 6.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Schellinger Construction Co., Inc. 6.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE OK 20 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ranch One Cooperative, Inc. 20 FTE
NAT-SIZE S&S Structures, Inc. 20 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sice Orlando Office 20 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.