Distribution of electric power · Texas

Wharton County Electric Cooperative Inc.

El Campo, TX · ~38 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
1.1
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Wharton County Electric Cooperative Inc. runs at 91% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Distribution of electric power workplace, earning a grade C.

Wharton County Electric Cooperative Inc.: 1.1 TCR = 91% of Distribution of electric power BLS 1.2 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Wharton County Electric Cooperative Inc. safety composite

Wharton County Electric Cooperative Inc. scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 80% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

72/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.09 per 100 workers

Safer than 80% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 79% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Wharton County Electric Cooperative Inc.: 0.0 → 2.5 TCR

Peak year 2023 @ 2.6 TCR · DART/TCR 0× in 2024

Wharton County Electric Cooperative Inc.'s TCR rose 2.5 from 0.0 in 2018 to 2.5 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 2.6 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221122 · El Campo, TX AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 1.1 · 91% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #68/246
  • PHOTO FRKSC Frackville Ser…
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~38 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: FRKSC Frackville Service Center (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Wharton County Electric Cooperative Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Wharton County Electric Cooperative Inc. averages 1.1 TCR (91% of the Distribution of electric power BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Wharton County Electric Cooperative Inc. TCR series: 2018=0 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=2.5 · 2023=2.6 · 2024=2.5 · BLS 1.2

Where Wharton County Electric Cooperative Inc. falls in its industry

2,958 Distribution of electric power establishments

Safer than 80% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #68 safest of 246 Distribution of electric power employers in Texas.

Wharton County Electric Cooperative Inc. (38 employees, TCR 1.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 2.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Wharton County Electric Cooperative Inc.
Wharton County Electric Cooperative Inc. (38 employees, TCR 1.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 2.5

Wharton County Electric Cooperative Inc. has fewer employees than the Distribution of electric power median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.5 0.0 1 0 0
2023 2.6 0.0 1 0 0
2022 2.5 2.5 1 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221122 · TX · El Campo

2,958 Distribution of electric power employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 22 employers in El Campo, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR FRKSC Frackville Service Center 1.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Palatka District Office 1.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR East Syracuse NYEK-NYEK 1.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR LUMA, Ponce Customer Experience 1.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Bovina Cattle Company 38 FTE
STATE-SIZE PILGRIMS MT. PLEASANT BREEDER AND BROILER 38 FTE
STATE-SIZE United Agricultural- Danevang 38 FTE
STATE-SIZE 2362/3714-Lubbock, TX-R&D (Monsanto Co.) 38 FTE
CITY-NEAR Greenleaf Nursery Company 302 FTE
CITY-NEAR 344 196 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 344 192 FTE
CITY-NEAR RedTail Hawk Solar Project 174 FTE
NAT-TCR Standard Office Systems of Atlanta 1.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Solvay USA LLC 1.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Hillyard Co. - Lancaster 1.1 TCR
NAT-TCR E.T. MacKenzie of Florida, Inc. 1.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE LeafFilter IND 38 FTE
NAT-SIZE Metro Site Fabricators, LLC 38 FTE
NAT-SIZE BHJ - Hartwell 38 FTE
NAT-SIZE Farrelli's Parkland 38 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.