Construction management, water and sewage treatment plant · Florida
Wharton Smith, Inc.
Sanford, FL · ~501 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.
- B
- Good Safety Record
- 1.7
- Avg TCR
- 2.8
- Industry avg
- 0
- Fatalities
The verdict
Wharton Smith, Inc. runs at 60% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Construction management, water and sewage treatment plant workplace, earning a grade B.
- B
- Good Safety Record
- 1.7
- avg TCR · per 100 workers
- 2.8
- industry benchmark (BLS)
- 17
- recordable injuries tracked
Grade compares Wharton Smith, Inc.'s OSHA Total Case Rate of 1.7 to the Construction management, water and sewage treatment plant BLS benchmark of 2.8 (60% of benchmark) across 2 years of Form 300A filings (2016–2024). <a href="/methodology">See methodology</a> for reporting-limitation caveats.
Injury rate over time
Wharton Smith, Inc.'s yearly Total Case Rate, against the 2.8 industry benchmark.
Where Wharton Smith, Inc. falls in its industry
1,851 Construction management, water establishmentsSafer than 64% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.5.
Narrower to Florida alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #46 safest of 144 Construction management, water employers in Florida.
Trend analysis for Wharton Smith, Inc.
Between 2016 and 2017, Wharton Smith, Inc.'s Total Case Rate worsened from 1.5 to 1.9 recordable injuries per 100 full-time workers, a 26% increase across 1 year of OSHA reporting.
The safest year on record was 2016, at a TCR of 1.5, while 2017 saw the highest rate, at 1.9, a spread of 0.4 points between the best and worst reporting years. That's a comparatively narrow spread, suggesting a fairly consistent safety record across the 2 years with a usable rate on file, rather than one outlier year skewing the multi-year average.
Summed across those 2 reporting years, Wharton Smith, Inc. recorded 17 total injuries and illnesses, with no fatalities reported in any of those years. Readers comparing establishments should weigh the 2-year trend above alongside establishment size, since a larger workforce naturally accumulates more raw incidents even at a lower per-100-worker rate.
Verify This Employer with OSHA
The 17 injuries shown on this page for Wharton Smith, Inc. are sourced from its own 2 years of mandatory OSHA Form 300A summaries. Cross-check the underlying establishment record directly against the federal source, name, NAICS classification, recordable case totals, and inspection history are all searchable on OSHA's Establishment-Specific Injury and Illness Data system.
Verify on OSHA Establishment SearchSource: U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Establishment-Specific Injury and Illness Data. NAICS 237110 - Construction management, water and sewage treatment plant.
DART Rate, Transparent Calculation (2017)
What is the DART rate formula?
DART (Days Away, Restricted, or Transferred) is computed by OSHA as incidents × 200,000 ÷ hours worked. The 200,000-hour denominator equals roughly 100 full-time workers, which lets establishments of very different sizes be compared directly.
8 DART incidents × 200,000 ÷ 1,069,593 hours worked = 1.50 DART
Methodology: 29 CFR 1904, OSHA Form 300A recordkeeping
Cross-Validating Context, Establishment vs Industry vs State
| Benchmark | TCR | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Wharton Smith, Inc. (this establishment) | 1.68 | OSHA ITA Form 300A, 2-year avg |
| Utility line (i.e., sewer, water), construction industry avg | 2.80 | BLS IIF, NAICS 237110 |
| Florida state avg (all industries) | 4.57 | OSHA ITA, state-level rollup |
Industry benchmarks: Bureau of Labor Statistics, Injuries, Illnesses, and Fatalities (IIF) program
Reportable Incident Timeline
Year-by-year reportable incidents (recordable injuries + illnesses + fatalities) submitted by Wharton Smith, Inc. to OSHA's Injury Tracking Application. Each row anchors to OSHA's inspection records search where you can pull the underlying inspection case numbers and citations for that establishment-year.
- 2017: 10 reportable incidents · 10 injuries, 0 illnesses, 0 fatalities - OSHA inspection records (case numbers)
- 2016: 7 reportable incidents · 7 injuries, 0 illnesses, 0 fatalities - OSHA inspection records (case numbers)
Source: OSHA Inspection Information System (IMIS) - inspection case-number records
Year-by-Year Safety Data
| Year | TCR | DART | Injuries | Illnesses | Fatalities |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 | 1.9 | 1.5 | 10 | 0 | 0 |
| 2016 | 1.5 | 0.8 | 7 | 0 | 0 |
What this grade means for you
Use this grade as a relative read on Wharton Smith, Inc.'s reported OSHA injury record, strong versus its Construction management, water and sewage treatment plant peers, but not a guarantee about any single site today.
- At 60% of the Construction management, water and sewage treatment plant benchmark, Wharton Smith, Inc. reports fewer injuries than typical peers, still worth asking how safety is managed day to day. Know your rights
- Judge this record against the wider Construction management, water and sewage treatment plant sector, where injury rates vary widely, before comparing it in isolation. See the industry
- Grades reflect 2016–2024 filings; check the latest establishment record straight from OSHA, or look up a different employer. Look up another
Safety grades reflect employers' self-reported OSHA Form 300A filings from 2016 to 2024 and can lag current conditions. A grade is not a guarantee that any specific workplace is safe or unsafe today. See our methodology and disclaimer.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Wharton Smith, Inc.'s safety grade?
How many injuries has Wharton Smith, Inc. reported?
Similar Employers
Matched by safety record across the industry, by workforce size within Florida, and by nearby establishments in Sanford - a different peer set than the category browse links below.
Similar TCR (~1.7)
Similar size (~501 workers)
Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.
Every figure and grade on PlainSafetyScore is computed directly from OSHA's published Injury Tracking Application data and BLS industry benchmarks, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these safety grades, or report a data error. Data current as of 2016-2024 OSHA ITA release.