Automobile carrier trucking, long-distance · Michigan

Wheeler Trucking HQ (Flushing)

Flushing, MI · ~154 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
3.2
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Wheeler Trucking HQ (Flushing) runs at 72% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Automobile carrier trucking, long-distance workplace, earning a grade B.

Wheeler Trucking HQ (Flushing): 3.2 TCR = 72% of Automobile carrier trucking, long-distance BLS 4.5 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Wheeler Trucking HQ (Flushing) safety composite

Wheeler Trucking HQ (Flushing) scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 63% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 49%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

55/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 3.23 per 100 workers

Safer than 49% of industry peers

DART rate
C 1.19 per 100 workers

Safer than 63% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 53% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Wheeler Trucking HQ (Flushing): 0.0 → 279.1 TCR

Peak year 2021 @ 279.1 TCR · DART/TCR 86.4× in 2021

Wheeler Trucking HQ (Flushing)'s TCR rose 279.1 from 0.0 in 2016 to 279.1 in 2021. In 2021, DART was 86.4× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 484230 · Flushing, MI AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 3.2 · 72% of ind

  • DART 279.1 DART
  • RANK #10/25
  • PHOTO Groendyke Transport …
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 48 inj
  • SIZE ~154 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Groendyke Transport - Grand Junction (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

Wheeler Trucking HQ (Flushing) in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Wheeler Trucking HQ (Flushing) averages 3.2 TCR (72% of the Automobile carrier trucking, long-distance BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Wheeler Trucking HQ (Flushing) TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=6 · 2018=4.7 · 2019=4.3 · 2020=1.2 · 2021=279.1 · BLS 4.5

Where Wheeler Trucking HQ (Flushing) falls in its industry

1,026 Automobile carrier trucking, l establishments

Safer than 49% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #10 safest of 25 Automobile carrier trucking, l employers in Michigan.

Wheeler Trucking HQ (Flushing) (154 employees, TCR 3.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 3.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Wheeler Trucking HQ (Flushing)
Wheeler Trucking HQ (Flushing) (154 employees, TCR 3.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 3.2

Wheeler Trucking HQ (Flushing) has more employees than the Automobile carrier trucking, long-distan median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 279.1 279.1 12 0 0
2020 1.2 1.2 4 0 0
2019 4.3 4.3 11 0 0
2018 4.7 4.3 12 0 0
2017 6.0 6.0 9 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

484230 · MI · Flushing

1,026 Automobile carrier trucking, long-distance employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 19 employers in Flushing, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Groendyke Transport - Grand Junction 3.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Stockton - 01 3.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR UR-Baltimore 3.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Olin/Pioneer/Henderson Drivers 3.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Midwest Energy Cooperative 154 FTE
STATE-SIZE OCG Companies 154 FTE
STATE-SIZE Shoreline Fruit, LLC - Williamsburg 154 FTE
STATE-SIZE Louisiana-Pacific Sagola 154 FTE
CITY-NEAR Ultra-Dex, LLC 545 FTE
CITY-NEAR Fessler & Bowman 541 FTE
CITY-NEAR Heartland Health Care Center - Fostrian 177 FTE
CITY-NEAR Heartland Health Care Center Fostrian 160 FTE
NAT-TCR Sodexo at Ou Medicine Inc-Ou Medical Cen 3.2 TCR
NAT-TCR 4765-LAXPIPAX0 3.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Cartridge Actuated Devices, Inc. 3.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Entergy Blytheville 3.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE 4818-DE01 154 FTE
NAT-SIZE MMK Costa Mesa 154 FTE
NAT-SIZE Southwark Metal - Mississippi Division 154 FTE
NAT-SIZE Houma North Ramp 154 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.