Boxes, corrugated and solid fiber, made from purchased paper or paperboard · Minnesota

White Bear Lake Container

White Bear Lake, MN · ~126 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.3
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

White Bear Lake Container runs at 38% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Boxes, corrugated and solid fiber, made from purchased paper or paperboard workplace, earning a grade A.

White Bear Lake Container: 1.3 TCR = 38% of Boxes, corrugated and solid fiber, made from purchased paper or paperboard BLS 3.3 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

White Bear Lake Container safety composite

White Bear Lake Container scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 78% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

63/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.25 per 100 workers

Safer than 78% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0.75 per 100 workers

Safer than 56% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

White Bear Lake Container: 0.0 → 3.0 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 3.0 TCR · DART/TCR 0.6× in 2024

White Bear Lake Container's TCR rose 3.0 from 0.0 in 2022 to 3.0 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 0.6× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 322211 · White Bear Lake, MN AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 1.3 · 38% of ind

  • DART 0.8 DART
  • RANK #7/30
  • PHOTO CHICAGO, IL (contain…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 5 inj
  • SIZE ~126 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: CHICAGO, IL (container) (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

White Bear Lake Container in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows White Bear Lake Container averages 1.3 TCR (38% of the Boxes, corrugated and solid fiber, made from purchased paper or paperboard BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

White Bear Lake Container TCR series: 2022=0 · 2023=0.8 · 2024=3 · BLS 3.3

Where White Bear Lake Container falls in its industry

1,338 Boxes, corrugated and solid fi establishments

Safer than 78% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #7 safest of 30 Boxes, corrugated and solid fi employers in Minnesota.

White Bear Lake Container (126 employees, TCR 1.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 102 employees and a TCR of 2.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0123456 Average employees Total Case Rate White Bear Lake Container
White Bear Lake Container (126 employees, TCR 1.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 102 employees and a TCR of 2.4

White Bear Lake Container has more employees than the Boxes, corrugated and solid fiber, made median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 3.0 0.8 4 0 0
2023 0.8 0.0 1 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

322211 · MN · White Bear Lake

1,338 Boxes, corrugated and solid fiber, made from purchased paper or paperboard employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 88 employers in White Bear Lake, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR CHICAGO, IL (container) 1.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR 5160 Winston-Salem Manufacturing 1.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR 4353 Fernandina Container 1.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Springhill LA 1.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE PCL Construction Services, Inc. 126 FTE
STATE-SIZE 458490 126 FTE
STATE-SIZE InTech Industries Inc. MN 126 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hancock Concrete Products, LLC- Hancock 126 FTE
CITY-NEAR White Bear Lake Area Schools 1,280 FTE
CITY-NEAR Carlson Building Maintenance, Inc. 693 FTE
CITY-NEAR Carlson Building Maintenance Corporate Office 667 FTE
CITY-NEAR Century College 557 FTE
NAT-TCR Smetana & Associates Construction Co 1.3 TCR
NAT-TCR JM Smucker Company 1.3 TCR
NAT-TCR HQ-FOAM-HEADQUARTERS 1.3 TCR
NAT-TCR HMH Contractors, Inc. 1.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE 3859 - Houston Sortation Center 126 FTE
NAT-SIZE Yazoo Mills, Inc. 126 FTE
NAT-SIZE Complex Chemical Co. Inc. 126 FTE
NAT-SIZE Western Building Group 126 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.