Distribution of electric power · Maryland

White Marsh Training Center

White Marsh, MD · ~51 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
1.0
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

White Marsh Training Center runs at 85% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Distribution of electric power workplace, earning a grade C.

White Marsh Training Center: 1.0 TCR = 85% of Distribution of electric power BLS 1.2 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

White Marsh Training Center safety composite

White Marsh Training Center scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 82% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

73/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.02 per 100 workers

Safer than 82% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 79% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

White Marsh Training Center held a steady TCR band

White Marsh Training Center's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 3.4 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=0.0 · 2017=0.0 · 2018=1.9 · 2019=2.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=1.9 · 2023=3.4 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221122 · White Marsh, MD AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 1.0 · 85% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #8/30
  • PHOTO Madison
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 4 inj
  • SIZE ~51 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Madison (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Maryland employers → · Look up another →

White Marsh Training Center in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows White Marsh Training Center averages 1.0 TCR (85% of the Distribution of electric power BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

White Marsh Training Center TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=0 · 2018=1.9 · 2019=2 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=1.9 · 2023=3.4 · 2024=0 · BLS 1.2

Where White Marsh Training Center falls in its industry

2,958 Distribution of electric power establishments

Safer than 82% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Maryland alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #8 safest of 30 Distribution of electric power employers in Maryland.

White Marsh Training Center (51 employees, TCR 1.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 2.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate White Marsh Training Center
White Marsh Training Center (51 employees, TCR 1.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 2.5

White Marsh Training Center has fewer employees than the Distribution of electric power median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 3.4 1.7 2 0 0
2022 1.9 1.9 1 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 2.0 2.0 1 0 0
2018 1.9 1.9 0 1 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221122 · MD · White Marsh

2,958 Distribution of electric power employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,213 rated employers in Maryland with headcount on file · 23 employers in White Marsh, MD · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Madison 1.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR WICHITA FALLS SERVICE CTR 1.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR OG&E-Ft Smith SC 1.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR GLENMONT SERVICE CENTER-NY06 1.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Barkay, Inc. 51 FTE
STATE-SIZE Inland Pipe Rehabilitation Northeast, LLC 51 FTE
STATE-SIZE Monumental Paving & Excavating, Inc. 51 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hagerstown, MD Office 51 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - MTN9 1,386 FTE
CITY-NEAR White Marsh Office 545 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6458-ZBAL 256 FTE
CITY-NEAR TransCore - T0322 - White Marsh 163 FTE
NAT-TCR Madison 1.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Advanced Industrial Services LLC - Columbus 1.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Dassault Falcon Jet LIT 1.0 TCR
NAT-TCR MKS Lawrence 1.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Sheppard Trucking Inc. 51 FTE
NAT-SIZE Olean Trl 51 FTE
NAT-SIZE MRO Main 51 FTE
NAT-SIZE GBS PrinTech Labeling and Filing Malvern Location 51 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.