Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · Minnesota

Whitefish at the Lakes

Crosslake, MN · ~50 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
7.3
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Whitefish at the Lakes runs at 192% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade D.

Whitefish at the Lakes: 7.3 TCR = 192% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Whitefish at the Lakes safety composite

Whitefish at the Lakes scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 54% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 49%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

51/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 7.31 per 100 workers

Safer than 49% of industry peers

DART rate
D 2.81 per 100 workers

Safer than 54% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−8.1

2020→2024

Whitefish at the Lakes injury rate improved

Whitefish at the Lakes's TCR fell 8.1 from 10.9 in 2020 to 2.8 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 199.8 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.38× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2020=10.9 · 2021=8.3 · 2022=199.8 · 2024=2.8

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Crosslake, MN ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 7.3 · 192% of ind

  • DART 2.8 DART
  • RANK #120/240
  • PHOTO 63162 SUNRISE OF RIC…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 5 inj
  • SIZE ~50 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 63162 SUNRISE OF RICHMOND (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Whitefish at the Lakes in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Whitefish at the Lakes averages 7.3 TCR (192% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Whitefish at the Lakes TCR series: 2020=10.9 · 2021=8.3 · 2022=199.8 · 2024=2.8 · BLS 3.8

Where Whitefish at the Lakes falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 49% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #120 safest of 240 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Minnesota.

Whitefish at the Lakes (50 employees, TCR 7.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Whitefish at the Lakes
Whitefish at the Lakes (50 employees, TCR 7.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Whitefish at the Lakes has more employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.8 2.8 1 0 0
2022 199.8 199.8 2 3 0
2021 8.3 8.3 2 0 0
2020 10.9 10.9 0 2 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · MN · Crosslake

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 5 employers in Crosslake, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 63162 SUNRISE OF RICHMOND 7.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Ormond Beach Solvere OPCO, LLC 7.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR MBK - The Firs 7.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Brookdale Troy-MC 7.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Meadow Star 50 FTE
STATE-SIZE Louriston 50 FTE
STATE-SIZE East Dublin 50 FTE
STATE-SIZE Edina Service Center-UB 50 FTE
CITY-NEAR Wes Hanson Builders 51 FTE
CITY-NEAR CITY OF CROSSLAKE 38 FTE
CITY-NEAR Baratto Brothers Constuction 38 FTE
CITY-NEAR Crosslake 24 FTE
NAT-TCR 288 Ypsilanti 7.3 TCR
NAT-TCR City of Baker City 7.3 TCR
NAT-TCR US Foods Omaha 7.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Texaloy Foundry 7.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Progressive Protein 50 FTE
NAT-SIZE Weber Industries Inc 50 FTE
NAT-SIZE Jones Produce Inc 50 FTE
NAT-SIZE The Andersons Inc. - Montgomery 50 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2022, 2021, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.