Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities · Pennsylvania

Whitetail Springs

Pittsburgh, PA · ~36 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
6.2
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Whitetail Springs runs at 163% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities workplace, earning a grade D.

Whitetail Springs: 6.2 TCR = 163% of Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities BLS 3.8 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Whitetail Springs safety composite

Whitetail Springs scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 87% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

66/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 6.2 per 100 workers

Safer than 57% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 87% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Whitetail Springs held a steady TCR band

Whitetail Springs's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2019 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 25.0 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2019=0.0 · 2020=25.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2023=6.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623311 · Pittsburgh, PA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 6.2 · 163% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #105/257
  • PHOTO Stonebridge at Montg…
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 6 inj
  • SIZE ~36 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Stonebridge at Montgomery (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

Whitetail Springs in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Whitetail Springs averages 6.2 TCR (163% of the Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Whitetail Springs TCR series: 2019=0 · 2020=25 · 2021=0 · 2023=6 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.8

Where Whitetail Springs falls in its industry

4,127 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 57% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #105 safest of 257 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Pennsylvania.

Whitetail Springs (36 employees, TCR 6.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Whitetail Springs
Whitetail Springs (36 employees, TCR 6.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9

Whitetail Springs has fewer employees than the Assisted-living facilities with on-site median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 6.0 6.0 2 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 25.0 21.7 4 11 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623311 · PA · Pittsburgh

4,127 Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 1,170 employers in Pittsburgh, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Stonebridge at Montgomery 6.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR 3457-02 SPRINGFIELD MASONIC COMMUNITY 6.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Bickford of Gurnee 6.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Bentonville Retirement LLC dba Primrose of Rogers 6.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE George Didden Greenhouses, Inc. 36 FTE
STATE-SIZE Altoona 36 FTE
STATE-SIZE UGI Penn Natural Gas Williamsport 36 FTE
STATE-SIZE TIS - PA - Fairless Hills 36 FTE
CITY-NEAR United States Steel COrporation 15,229 FTE
CITY-NEAR University of Pittsburgh- Oakland 14,135 FTE
CITY-NEAR UPMC Presbyterian Shadyside (PUH) 13,900 FTE
CITY-NEAR University of Pittsburgh-Oakland 13,208 FTE
NAT-TCR Giant 337 6.2 TCR
NAT-TCR City of Kirkland 6.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Dedicated Duncan 6.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Dedicated Ridgefield 6.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE J&K Dairy, LLC 36 FTE
NAT-SIZE Highground Services, Inc 36 FTE
NAT-SIZE Atkore 36 FTE
NAT-SIZE Atlantic Aviation - PVD 36 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2021, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.