Telecommunications equipment and wiring (except transmission line) installation contractors · Texas

Whitlock - Dallas

Flower Mound, TX · ~155 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
1.8
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Whitlock - Dallas runs at 65% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Telecommunications equipment and wiring (except transmission line) installation contractors workplace, earning a grade B.

Whitlock - Dallas: 1.8 TCR = 65% of Telecommunications equipment and wiring (except transmission line) installation contractors BLS 2.8 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Whitlock - Dallas safety composite

Whitlock - Dallas scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 61% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 35%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

49/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 1.83 per 100 workers

Safer than 61% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.78 per 100 workers

Safer than 35% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.1

2017→2019

Whitlock - Dallas injury rate improved

Whitlock - Dallas's TCR fell 1.1 from 2.9 in 2017 to 1.8 in 2019. Peak filing year was 2017 at 2.9 TCR. In 2019, DART was 0.97× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=2.9 · 2018=0.8 · 2019=1.8

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238210 · Flower Mound, TX AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 1.8 · 65% of ind

  • DART 1.8 DART
  • RANK #201/424
  • PHOTO Cochran Inc.- Oregon
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 7 inj
  • SIZE ~155 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Cochran Inc.- Oregon (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Whitlock - Dallas in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Whitlock - Dallas averages 1.8 TCR (65% of the Telecommunications equipment and wiring (except transmission line) installation contractors BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Whitlock - Dallas TCR series: 2017=2.9 · 2018=0.8 · 2019=1.8 · BLS 2.8

Where Whitlock - Dallas falls in its industry

4,550 Telecommunications equipment a establishments

Safer than 61% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #201 safest of 424 Telecommunications equipment a employers in Texas.

Whitlock - Dallas (155 employees, TCR 1.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 63 employees and a TCR of 2.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Whitlock - Dallas
Whitlock - Dallas (155 employees, TCR 1.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 63 employees and a TCR of 2.5

Whitlock - Dallas has more employees than the Telecommunications equipment and wiring median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2019 1.8 1.8 2 0 0
2018 0.8 0.8 1 0 0
2017 2.9 2.9 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238210 · TX · Flower Mound

4,550 Telecommunications equipment and wiring (except transmission line) installation contractors employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 93 employers in Flower Mound, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Cochran Inc.- Oregon 1.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Main Office & Field 1.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Utilities Dynamics 1.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR ESCO 1.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Oncor Electric Delivery Southeast Transmission 155 FTE
STATE-SIZE West DOC 155 FTE
STATE-SIZE Powerhouse Financial Services 155 FTE
STATE-SIZE BAR Constructors Inc 155 FTE
CITY-NEAR MI Windows and Doors 805 FTE
CITY-NEAR Texas Health Flower Mound 725 FTE
CITY-NEAR Stryker Endoscopy Communications 590 FTE
CITY-NEAR Flower Mound TX 511 FTE
NAT-TCR Mueller Company 1.8 TCR
NAT-TCR whimsy trucking 1.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Royal East - Coopersburg 1.8 TCR
NAT-TCR 026 ABC Supply Co., Inc 1.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Clearwater Beach Resort & Spa (HR) 155 FTE
NAT-SIZE Boston (HR) 155 FTE
NAT-SIZE Washington Township Medical foundation 155 FTE
NAT-SIZE 0000000200 Public Safety-Police 155 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.