Bonded warehousing, general merchandise · Florida

Whse 99 Lakeland - #99

Lakeland, FL · ~782 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
7.2
Avg TCR
5.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Whse 99 Lakeland - #99 runs at 124% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Bonded warehousing, general merchandise workplace, earning a grade D.

Whse 99 Lakeland - #99: 7.2 TCR = 124% of Bonded warehousing, general merchandise BLS 5.8 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Whse 99 Lakeland - #99 safety composite

Whse 99 Lakeland - #99 scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 16%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

26/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 7.17 per 100 workers

Safer than 19% of industry peers

DART rate
F 6.37 per 100 workers

Safer than 16% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Whse 99 Lakeland - #99: 3.8 → 7.2 TCR

Peak year 2018 @ 9.0 TCR · DART/TCR 0.89× in 2024

Whse 99 Lakeland - #99's TCR rose 3.4 from 3.8 in 2016 to 7.2 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 9.0 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.89× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 493110 · Lakeland, FL ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 7.2 · 124% of ind

  • DART 6.4 DART
  • RANK #324/412
  • PHOTO PLANO DC BLDG 222 - …
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 496 inj
  • SIZE ~782 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: PLANO DC BLDG 222 - 3239 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Florida employers → · Look up another →

Whse 99 Lakeland - #99 in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Whse 99 Lakeland - #99 averages 7.2 TCR (124% of the Bonded warehousing, general merchandise BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Whse 99 Lakeland - #99 TCR series: 2016=3.8 · 2017=7.1 · 2018=9 · 2019=7.2 · 2020=8.9 · 2021=6.3 · 2022=8.7 · 2023=6.4 · 2024=7.2 · BLS 5.8

Where Whse 99 Lakeland - #99 falls in its industry

9,477 Bonded warehousing, general me establishments

Safer than 19% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Florida alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #324 safest of 412 Bonded warehousing, general me employers in Florida.

Whse 99 Lakeland - #99 (782 employees, TCR 7.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Whse 99 Lakeland - #99
Whse 99 Lakeland - #99 (782 employees, TCR 7.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 3.5

Whse 99 Lakeland - #99 has more employees than the Bonded warehousing, general merchandise median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 7.2 6.4 60 0 0
2023 6.4 6.0 56 0 0
2022 8.7 7.7 74 1 0
2021 6.3 5.2 52 0 0
2020 8.9 8.4 63 0 0
2019 7.2 6.1 53 0 0
2018 9.0 7.2 66 0 0
2017 7.1 5.2 49 0 0
2016 3.8 3.0 23 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

493110 · FL · Lakeland

9,477 Bonded warehousing, general merchandise employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 26,569 rated employers in Florida with headcount on file · 426 employers in Lakeland, FL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR PLANO DC BLDG 222 - 3239 7.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Amazon.com Services LLC - HSV2 7.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Walgreens of Puerto Rico Inc 7.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Amazon.com Services LLC - DET2 7.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Loews Royal Pacific Resort 782 FTE
STATE-SIZE DEL AIR HVAC 783 FTE
STATE-SIZE FLTAB - TAMPA 783 FTE
STATE-SIZE TAMPA (FLTAB) 781 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lakeland Regional Medical Center 5,518 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lakeland Distribution 2,927 FTE
CITY-NEAR Clinic 1,651 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - KLAL 1,210 FTE
NAT-TCR Oceana County Medical Care Facility 7.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Louisville East 7.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Hugo's #7 7.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Harvard Integrations 7.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE John Deere Kernersville 782 FTE
NAT-SIZE Paris Regional Medical Center 782 FTE
NAT-SIZE Jasper Products, LLC 782 FTE
NAT-SIZE City of San Bernardino 782 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.