Printing inks manufacturing · South Carolina

Wikoff Color Corp. - Fort Mill - Plant

Fort Mill, SC · ~79 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
7.3
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Wikoff Color Corp. - Fort Mill - Plant runs at 221% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Printing inks manufacturing workplace, earning a grade F.

Wikoff Color Corp. - Fort Mill - Plant: 7.3 TCR = 221% of Printing inks manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Wikoff Color Corp. - Fort Mill - Plant safety composite

Wikoff Color Corp. - Fort Mill - Plant scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 3%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

29/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 7.29 per 100 workers

Safer than 3% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.55 per 100 workers

Safer than 45% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Wikoff Color Corp. - Fort Mill - Plant: 2.5 → 4.6 TCR

Peak year 2023 @ 12.8 TCR · DART/TCR 0.21× in 2024

Wikoff Color Corp. - Fort Mill - Plant's TCR rose 2.1 from 2.5 in 2019 to 4.6 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 12.8 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.21× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 325910 · Fort Mill, SC ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 7.3 · 221% of ind

  • DART 1.6 DART
  • RANK #5/6
  • PHOTO Elmwood Park Facility
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 26 inj
  • SIZE ~79 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Elmwood Park Facility (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · South Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Wikoff Color Corp. - Fort Mill - Plant in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Wikoff Color Corp. - Fort Mill - Plant averages 7.3 TCR (221% of the Printing inks manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Wikoff Color Corp. - Fort Mill - Plant TCR series: 2019=2.5 · 2020=5.6 · 2021=8.6 · 2022=9.6 · 2023=12.8 · 2024=4.6 · BLS 3.3

Where Wikoff Color Corp. - Fort Mill - Plant falls in its industry

111 Printing inks manufacturing establishments

Safer than 3% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to South Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #5 safest of 6 Printing inks manufacturing employers in South Carolina.

Wikoff Color Corp. - Fort Mill - Plant (79 employees, TCR 7.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 2.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 02468 Average employees Total Case Rate Wikoff Color Corp. - Fort Mill - Plant
Wikoff Color Corp. - Fort Mill - Plant (79 employees, TCR 7.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 2.5

Wikoff Color Corp. - Fort Mill - Plant has more employees than the Printing inks manufacturing median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 4.6 1.6 3 0 0
2023 12.8 6.4 7 3 0
2022 9.6 2.1 5 4 0
2021 8.6 3.2 5 3 0
2020 5.6 5.6 5 0 0
2019 2.5 1.3 1 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

325910 · SC · Fort Mill

111 Printing inks manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,610 rated employers in South Carolina with headcount on file · 121 employers in Fort Mill, SC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Elmwood Park Facility 7.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR INX International Ink Co. (3500) 7.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Flint Group Packaging Inks North America Corporation 7.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Chromatic Technologies, Inc 7.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE CL Benton & Sons, Inc. 79 FTE
STATE-SIZE True Timber Outdoors Holding 79 FTE
STATE-SIZE Siroflex, a company of Bostik, Inc. 79 FTE
STATE-SIZE Glendinning Products LLC 79 FTE
CITY-NEAR South East Distribution Center SEDC 1,467 FTE
CITY-NEAR South East Distribution Center - SEDC 1,078 FTE
CITY-NEAR Shutterfly Fort Mill 841 FTE
CITY-NEAR US FOODS FORT MILL 719 FTE
NAT-TCR All Phase Landscape Construction, Inc. 7.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Yuma Region Four 7.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Omaha - OMA 7.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Richfield Office/Shop 7.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Poplar Bluff Packaging Center 79 FTE
NAT-SIZE Emmetsburg Care Center 79 FTE
NAT-SIZE Accurate Corrosion Control, Inc 79 FTE
NAT-SIZE Statesville Brick Company 79 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.