Processing of textile mill waste and recovering fibers · Georgia

William Barnet & Son LLC

Savannah, GA · ~61 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.3
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

William Barnet & Son LLC runs at 39% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Processing of textile mill waste and recovering fibers workplace, earning a grade A.

William Barnet & Son LLC: 1.3 TCR = 39% of Processing of textile mill waste and recovering fibers BLS 3.3 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

William Barnet & Son LLC safety composite

William Barnet & Son LLC scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 84% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 34%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

58/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.3 per 100 workers

Safer than 84% of industry peers

DART rate
F 1.51 per 100 workers

Safer than 34% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.4

2019→2023

William Barnet & Son LLC injury rate improved

William Barnet & Son LLC's TCR fell 1.4 from 2.9 in 2019 to 1.5 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2019 at 2.9 TCR. In 2023, DART was 1.16× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2019=2.9 · 2020=2.1 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=1.5

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 314999 · Savannah, GA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 1.3 · 39% of ind

  • DART 1.5 DART
  • RANK #2/10
  • PHOTO Alpha ProTech Engine…
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 4 inj
  • SIZE ~61 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Alpha ProTech Engineered Products Inc (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Georgia employers → · Look up another →

William Barnet & Son LLC in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows William Barnet & Son LLC averages 1.3 TCR (39% of the Processing of textile mill waste and recovering fibers BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

William Barnet & Son LLC TCR series: 2019=2.9 · 2020=2.1 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=1.5 · BLS 3.3

Where William Barnet & Son LLC falls in its industry

89 Processing of textile mill was establishments

Safer than 84% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Georgia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #2 safest of 10 Processing of textile mill was employers in Georgia.

William Barnet & Son LLC (61 employees, TCR 1.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 81 employees and a TCR of 3.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate William Barnet & Son LLC
William Barnet & Son LLC (61 employees, TCR 1.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 81 employees and a TCR of 3.1

William Barnet & Son LLC has fewer employees than the Processing of textile mill waste and rec median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 1.5 1.5 1 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 2.1 2.1 1 0 0
2019 2.9 2.9 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

314999 · GA · Savannah

89 Processing of textile mill waste and recovering fibers employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 14,941 rated employers in Georgia with headcount on file · 511 employers in Savannah, GA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Alpha ProTech Engineered Products Inc 1.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR AstenJohnson CLT 1.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Vantage Custom Classics- St. Louis 1.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Global Products, Inc. - Cherokee 1.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Columbus, GA 61 FTE
STATE-SIZE Altamaha EMC 61 FTE
STATE-SIZE North Shallowford Operating 4404 North Shallowford Rd 61 FTE
STATE-SIZE Yorkville 61 FTE
CITY-NEAR Gulfstream Aerospace 13,245 FTE
CITY-NEAR Memorial Health University Medical Center 3,186 FTE
CITY-NEAR Savannah College of Art and Design 2,369 FTE
CITY-NEAR Memorial Health University Medical 2,056 FTE
NAT-TCR Colvos Construction LLC 1.3 TCR
NAT-TCR ACA Contracting Inc. 1.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Foss Performance Materials LLC 1.3 TCR
NAT-TCR UW Seattle 1.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Accede Mold & Tool Co., Inc 61 FTE
NAT-SIZE Langley Air Force Base 61 FTE
NAT-SIZE Vegetation Management 61 FTE
NAT-SIZE Technetics 61 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.