Addition, alteration and renovation general contractors, commercial and institutional building · New York

William H. Lane Inc

Binghamton, NY · ~111 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.0
Avg TCR
2.9
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

William H. Lane Inc runs at 138% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Addition, alteration and renovation general contractors, commercial and institutional building workplace, earning a grade D.

William H. Lane Inc: 4.0 TCR = 138% of Addition, alteration and renovation general contractors, commercial and institutional building BLS 2.9 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

William H. Lane Inc safety composite

William H. Lane Inc scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 73% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 30%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

50/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 4 per 100 workers

Safer than 30% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 73% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−5.1

2016→2024

William H. Lane Inc injury rate improved

William H. Lane Inc's TCR fell 5.1 from 5.1 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2019 at 10.7 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=5.1 · 2017=6.7 · 2018=5.3 · 2019=10.7 · 2020=2.5 · 2021=1.4 · 2022=1.7 · 2023=2.6 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 236220 · Binghamton, NY ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 4.0 · 138% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #163/218
  • PHOTO Iconica
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 32 inj
  • SIZE ~111 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Iconica (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New York employers → · Look up another →

William H. Lane Inc in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows William H. Lane Inc averages 4.0 TCR (138% of the Addition, alteration and renovation general contractors, commercial and institutional building BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

William H. Lane Inc TCR series: 2016=5.1 · 2017=6.7 · 2018=5.3 · 2019=10.7 · 2020=2.5 · 2021=1.4 · 2022=1.7 · 2023=2.6 · 2024=0 · BLS 2.9

Where William H. Lane Inc falls in its industry

4,692 Addition, alteration and renov establishments

Safer than 30% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New York alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #163 safest of 218 Addition, alteration and renov employers in New York.

William H. Lane Inc (111 employees, TCR 4.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 2.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 02468 Average employees Total Case Rate William H. Lane Inc
William H. Lane Inc (111 employees, TCR 4.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 2.3

William H. Lane Inc has more employees than the Addition, alteration and renovation gene median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 2.6 2.6 2 0 0
2022 1.7 1.7 1 0 0
2021 1.4 1.4 1 0 0
2020 2.5 2.5 1 0 0
2019 10.7 3.6 6 0 0
2018 5.3 2.1 5 0 0
2017 6.7 3.7 9 0 0
2016 5.1 3.6 7 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

236220 · NY · Binghamton

4,692 Addition, alteration and renovation general contractors, commercial and institutional building employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 21,008 rated employers in New York with headcount on file · 139 employers in Binghamton, NY · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Iconica 4.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Kopplow Construction Company, Inc. 4.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Power Source Systems Inc. 4.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Collier Construction 4.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Intergrow East 111 FTE
STATE-SIZE Midland Farms 111 FTE
STATE-SIZE PHRG LI 111 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hayner Hoyt Corp 111 FTE
CITY-NEAR United Health Services Hospitals, Inc. 2,528 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1855-NYBIN1 1,718 FTE
CITY-NEAR Southern Tier Independence Center 698 FTE
CITY-NEAR KIRKWOOD PLANT 544 FTE
NAT-TCR Lancaster, Pa 4.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Apple Motor Company, dba Apple Chevrolet Buick Northfield 4.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Larson Juhl La 4.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Robert D Moser Inc. 4.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Hickman 111 FTE
NAT-SIZE 14-1 Pacella Park Dr. Randolph, MA 02368 111 FTE
NAT-SIZE Caran Precision 111 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sodexo at William S Hart Sd Dining 111 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.