Pallets, wood or wood and metal combination, manufacturing · Pennsylvania

William Penn Highway

Easton, PA · ~88 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
11.8
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

William Penn Highway runs at 357% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Pallets, wood or wood and metal combination, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade F.

William Penn Highway: 11.8 TCR = 357% of Pallets, wood or wood and metal combination, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

William Penn Highway safety composite

William Penn Highway scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 6%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

22/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 11.79 per 100 workers

Safer than 18% of industry peers

DART rate
F 14.07 per 100 workers

Safer than 6% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

William Penn Highway: 6.3 → 18.1 TCR

Peak year 2018 @ 23.9 TCR · DART/TCR 1.19× in 2022

William Penn Highway's TCR rose 11.8 from 6.3 in 2016 to 18.1 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2018 at 23.9 TCR. In 2022, DART was 1.19× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 321920 · Easton, PA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 11.8 · 357% of ind

  • DART 14.1 DART
  • RANK #50/62
  • PHOTO Kamps Pallets Hugo
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 60 inj
  • SIZE ~88 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Kamps Pallets Hugo (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

William Penn Highway in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows William Penn Highway averages 11.8 TCR (357% of the Pallets, wood or wood and metal combination, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

William Penn Highway TCR series: 2016=6.3 · 2017=9.1 · 2018=23.9 · 2019=10 · 2020=13.7 · 2021=1.6 · 2022=18.1 · BLS 3.3

Where William Penn Highway falls in its industry

952 Pallets, wood or wood and meta establishments

Safer than 18% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #50 safest of 62 Pallets, wood or wood and meta employers in Pennsylvania.

William Penn Highway (88 employees, TCR 11.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 51 employees and a TCR of 6.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate William Penn Highway
William Penn Highway (88 employees, TCR 11.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 51 employees and a TCR of 6.3

William Penn Highway has more employees than the Pallets, wood or wood and metal combinat median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 18.1 14.1 6 3 0
2021 1.6 1.6 1 0 0
2020 13.7 13.7 3 7 0
2019 10.0 8.9 9 0 0
2018 23.9 19.3 26 0 0
2017 9.1 8.1 9 0 0
2016 6.3 5.2 6 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

321920 · PA · Easton

952 Pallets, wood or wood and metal combination, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 182 employers in Easton, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Kamps Pallets Hugo 11.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Timber Creek Resource - Antigo 11.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Valley Pallet - Salinas 11.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Kamps Levittown 11.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE JA Myers Bldg & Dev., Inc. 88 FTE
STATE-SIZE The Norwood Company 88 FTE
STATE-SIZE T-Ross Brothers Construction, Inc. 88 FTE
STATE-SIZE D & M Contracting Inc 88 FTE
CITY-NEAR North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : ABE4 1,394 FTE
CITY-NEAR LAFAYETTE COLLEGE 1,338 FTE
CITY-NEAR Victaulic - Forks 1,277 FTE
CITY-NEAR Radial - Easton 2 1,181 FTE
NAT-TCR Progressive Care - Majestic Pines 11.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Crossroads Place 11.8 TCR
NAT-TCR ISD 991 - ELC Windom (former Red Rock Learning Center) 11.8 TCR
NAT-TCR 178193-Sbn-Edison Park Sta 11.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Espinosa 88 FTE
NAT-SIZE Allis Roller 88 FTE
NAT-SIZE 4619 Navigation 88 FTE
NAT-SIZE State Industrial Products - Corporate 88 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.