Utility line (i.e., sewer, water), construction · Montana

Williams Civil Construction

Name: Williams Civil Construction Workplace Safety Data
Creator: PlainSafetyScore
License: https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

Bozeman, MT · ~62 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

Compiled by PlainSafetyScore · August 25, 2026

C
Average Safety Record: 3.3
Avg TCR: 2.8
Industry avg: 0
Fatalities

Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Williams Civil Construction runs at 119% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Utility line (i.e., sewer, water), construction workplace, earning a grade C.

Williams Civil Construction: 3.3 TCR = 119% of Utility line (i.e., sewer, water), construction BLS 2.8 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Williams Civil Construction safety composite

Williams Civil Construction scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 79% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 45%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

59/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR): D 3.33 per 100 workers

Safer than 45% of industry peers
DART rate: B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 79% of industry peers
Fatalities: D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Williams Civil Construction: 0.0 → 3.1 TCR

Peak year 2017 @ 6.9 TCR · DART/TCR 0× in 2018

Williams Civil Construction's TCR rose 3.1 from 0.0 in 2016 to 3.1 in 2018. Peak filing year was 2017 at 6.9 TCR. In 2018, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 237110 · Bozeman, MT ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 3.3 · 119% of ind

DART 0.0 DART
RANK #3/4
PHOTO 3757_10365
BOOK 3y book
INJ 6 inj
SIZE ~62 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 3757_10365 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Montana employers → · Look up another →

This site

3.3
3757_10365

3.3
Insituform Tec

3.3
Leath & Sons,

3.3
H&W Contractin

3.3

What this shows Williams Civil Construction averages 3.3 TCR (119% of the Utility line (i.e., sewer, water), construction BLS benchmark).

Williams Civil Construction TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=6.9 · 2018=3.1 · BLS 2.8

Where Williams Civil Construction falls in its industry

1,614 Utility line (i.e., sewer, wat establishments

Safer than 45% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.0.

Grade C

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Montana alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #3 safest of 4 Utility line (i.e., sewer, wat employers in Montana.

Williams Civil Construction (62 employees, TCR 3.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 54 employees and a TCR of 3.0

Williams Civil Construction has more employees than the Utility line (i.e., sewer, water), const median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year	TCR	DART	Injuries
2018	3.1	0.0	2
2017	6.9	5.2	4
2016	0.0	0.0	0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

237110 · MT · Bozeman

1,614 Utility line (i.e., sewer, water), construction employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 1,536 rated employers in Montana with headcount on file · 136 employers in Bozeman, MT · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel	Establishment	Place	Metric
NAICS-TCR	3757_10365	OSHKOSH, WI	3.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR	Insituform Technologies LLC - Pittsburgh	WARRENDALE, PA	3.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR	Leath & Sons, Inc	RAYTOWN, MO	3.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR	H&W Contracting LLC	SIOUX FALLS, SD	3.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE	Capra Group Inc.	BILLINGS	62 FTE
STATE-SIZE	Columbia Falls	COLUMBIA FALLS	62 FTE
STATE-SIZE	ABS-0030-0030-04022 FAC-04022-ANACONDA-MT	ANACONDA	62 FTE
STATE-SIZE	Shopko Store #112 (Helena, MT)	HELENA	62 FTE
CITY-NEAR	Bozeman Health Deaconess Hospital	Bozeman	1,739 FTE
CITY-NEAR	BZNPW9672 BZN - FRONTIER PAX R	Bozeman	1,543 FTE
CITY-NEAR	WM 2084	Bozeman	359 FTE
CITY-NEAR	2084	Bozeman	325 FTE
NAT-TCR	659 Monroe ROC	Monroe, NC	3.3 TCR
NAT-TCR	N and R of Bloomfield LLC	Bloomfield, MO	3.3 TCR
NAT-TCR	RailWorks Transit 2nd Avenue	New York, NY	3.3 TCR
NAT-TCR	KWF Sarasota, FL	Sarasota, FL	3.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE	The Waterford at Oshkosh	Oshkosh, WI	62 FTE
NAT-SIZE	207 Bristol	Bristol, VA	62 FTE
NAT-SIZE	Waugh Foods, Inc.	East Peoria, IL	62 FTE
NAT-SIZE	N and R of Fulton Inc	Fulton, MO	62 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.