Addition, alteration and renovation for-sale builders, commercial and institutional building · Florida

Williams Company

Orlando, FL · ~116 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.2
Avg TCR
2.9
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Williams Company runs at 7% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Addition, alteration and renovation for-sale builders, commercial and institutional building workplace, earning a grade A.

Williams Company: 0.2 TCR = 7% of Addition, alteration and renovation for-sale builders, commercial and institutional building BLS 2.9 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Williams Company safety composite

Williams Company scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 98% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 39%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

66/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.2 per 100 workers

Safer than 98% of industry peers

DART rate
D 0.8 per 100 workers

Safer than 39% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Williams Company: 0.0 → 0.8 TCR

Peak year 2021 @ 0.8 TCR · DART/TCR 4× in 2021

Williams Company's TCR rose 0.8 from 0.0 in 2018 to 0.8 in 2021. In 2021, DART was 4× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 236220 · Orlando, FL AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 0.2 · 7% of ind

  • DART 0.8 DART
  • RANK #4/218
  • PHOTO The Weitz Company - …
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~116 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: The Weitz Company - Shared Services Group (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Florida employers → · Look up another →

Williams Company in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Williams Company averages 0.2 TCR (7% of the Addition, alteration and renovation for-sale builders, commercial and institutional building BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Williams Company TCR series: 2018=0 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=0.8 · BLS 2.9

Where Williams Company falls in its industry

4,692 Addition, alteration and renov establishments

Safer than 98% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Florida alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #4 safest of 218 Addition, alteration and renov employers in Florida.

Williams Company (116 employees, TCR 0.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 2.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 02468 Average employees Total Case Rate Williams Company
Williams Company (116 employees, TCR 0.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 2.3

Williams Company has more employees than the Addition, alteration and renovation for- median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 0.8 0.8 1 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

236220 · FL · Orlando

4,692 Addition, alteration and renovation for-sale builders, commercial and institutional building employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 26,569 rated employers in Florida with headcount on file · 1,997 employers in Orlando, FL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR The Weitz Company - Shared Services Group 0.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Gilbane Building Company Chicago 0.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Gilbane Building Company Boston 0.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Gilbane Building Company Atlanta 0.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE D.R. Horton, Inc. - Panama City 116 FTE
STATE-SIZE Stansell Properties & Development 116 FTE
STATE-SIZE Bengoa Construction 116 FTE
STATE-SIZE ADF International Inc. 116 FTE
CITY-NEAR Universal Orlando Resort 20,343 FTE
CITY-NEAR Universal Parks and Resorts : UO 13,442 FTE
CITY-NEAR ADVENTHEALTH ORLANDO 11,412 FTE
CITY-NEAR Florida Hospital Orlando 10,318 FTE
NAT-TCR Corporate Office 0.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Elliott Group Cryodynamic Products 0.2 TCR
NAT-TCR CCG Pittsburgh 0.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Antelope II Group Home 0.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Ambulance Transportation Inc 116 FTE
NAT-SIZE Westerman Inc. - Bremen 116 FTE
NAT-SIZE Tri State Electric, Inc 116 FTE
NAT-SIZE Canterbury Nursing & Rehabiliation 116 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.