Structural steel erecting or iron work contractors · Georgia

Williams Erection Company, Inc.

Smyrna, GA · ~125 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
2.6
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Williams Erection Company, Inc. runs at 93% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Structural steel erecting or iron work contractors workplace, earning a grade C.

Williams Erection Company, Inc.: 2.6 TCR = 93% of Structural steel erecting or iron work contractors BLS 2.8 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Williams Erection Company, Inc. safety composite

Williams Erection Company, Inc. scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 67% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 53%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

59/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.61 per 100 workers

Safer than 67% of industry peers

DART rate
C 1.13 per 100 workers

Safer than 55% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 53% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.7

2016→2024

Williams Erection Company, Inc. injury rate improved

Williams Erection Company, Inc.'s TCR fell 1.7 from 3.4 in 2016 to 1.7 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 3.5 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.43× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=3.4 · 2018=3.5 · 2019=3.2 · 2020=2.6 · 2021=1.3 · 2022=2.1 · 2023=3.0 · 2024=1.7

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238120 · Smyrna, GA AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 2.6 · 93% of ind

  • DART 1.1 DART
  • RANK #6/19
  • PHOTO Dixie Crane services
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 35 inj
  • SIZE ~125 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Dixie Crane services (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Georgia employers → · Look up another →

Williams Erection Company, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Williams Erection Company, Inc. averages 2.6 TCR (93% of the Structural steel erecting or iron work contractors BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Williams Erection Company, Inc. TCR series: 2016=3.4 · 2018=3.5 · 2019=3.2 · 2020=2.6 · 2021=1.3 · 2022=2.1 · 2023=3 · 2024=1.7 · BLS 2.8

Where Williams Erection Company, Inc. falls in its industry

705 Structural steel erecting or i establishments

Safer than 67% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Georgia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #6 safest of 19 Structural steel erecting or i employers in Georgia.

Williams Erection Company, Inc. (125 employees, TCR 2.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 58 employees and a TCR of 3.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Williams Erection Company, Inc.
Williams Erection Company, Inc. (125 employees, TCR 2.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 58 employees and a TCR of 3.9

Williams Erection Company, Inc. has more employees than the Structural steel erecting or iron work c median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.7 1.1 3 0 0
2023 3.0 0.4 7 0 0
2022 2.1 0.7 3 0 0
2021 1.3 1.3 2 0 0
2020 2.6 1.5 5 0 0
2019 3.2 1.2 8 0 0
2018 3.5 0.9 4 0 0
2016 3.4 0.0 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238120 · GA · Smyrna

705 Structural steel erecting or iron work contractors employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 14,941 rated employers in Georgia with headcount on file · 102 employers in Smyrna, GA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Dixie Crane services 2.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Titan Reinforcing, LLC 2.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Rebar Reinforcement Placers, LLC 2.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Doherty Steel 2.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Lady Moon Farms, Inc. Georgia 125 FTE
STATE-SIZE SMITH DOUGLAS REALTY 125 FTE
STATE-SIZE Civil Site Services, Inc. 125 FTE
STATE-SIZE UPC Southeast LLC 125 FTE
CITY-NEAR AMZL : DAT1 1,239 FTE
CITY-NEAR Chesley Brown International 1,086 FTE
CITY-NEAR UCB Smyrna 1,080 FTE
CITY-NEAR Smyrna 819 FTE
NAT-TCR Matrix Plastic Products, Inc. 2.6 TCR
NAT-TCR R.W. Sauder Inc 2.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Ironwood Plastics 2.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Daltile / Florence PDC 2.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Apex Homes of PA, LLC 125 FTE
NAT-SIZE Pitt Ohio - Chicago 125 FTE
NAT-SIZE Davis-Houk Mechanical, Inc. 125 FTE
NAT-SIZE FoodTown #007 125 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.