Bars, concrete reinforcing, manufacturing · Georgia

Williams Form Engineering Georgia

Lithia Springs, GA · ~53 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
5.7
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Williams Form Engineering Georgia runs at 174% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Bars, concrete reinforcing, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade D.

Williams Form Engineering Georgia: 5.7 TCR = 174% of Bars, concrete reinforcing, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Williams Form Engineering Georgia safety composite

Williams Form Engineering Georgia scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 30%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

39/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 5.74 per 100 workers

Safer than 39% of industry peers

DART rate
F 3.46 per 100 workers

Safer than 30% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.6

2020→2024

Williams Form Engineering Georgia injury rate improved

Williams Form Engineering Georgia's TCR fell 3.6 from 7.1 in 2020 to 3.5 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 8.7 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.6× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2020=7.1 · 2021=8.7 · 2022=4.1 · 2023=5.4 · 2024=3.5

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332312 · Lithia Springs, GA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 5.7 · 174% of ind

  • DART 3.5 DART
  • RANK #35/51
  • PHOTO Jeffords Steel and E…
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 15 inj
  • SIZE ~53 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Jeffords Steel and Engineering Company - Potsdam (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Georgia employers → · Look up another →

Williams Form Engineering Georgia in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Williams Form Engineering Georgia averages 5.7 TCR (174% of the Bars, concrete reinforcing, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Williams Form Engineering Georgia TCR series: 2020=7.1 · 2021=8.7 · 2022=4.1 · 2023=5.4 · 2024=3.5 · BLS 3.3

Where Williams Form Engineering Georgia falls in its industry

1,491 Bars, concrete reinforcing, ma establishments

Safer than 39% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Georgia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #35 safest of 51 Bars, concrete reinforcing, ma employers in Georgia.

Williams Form Engineering Georgia (53 employees, TCR 5.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 54 employees and a TCR of 4.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Williams Form Engineering Georgia
Williams Form Engineering Georgia (53 employees, TCR 5.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 54 employees and a TCR of 4.6

Williams Form Engineering Georgia has fewer employees than the Bars, concrete reinforcing, manufacturin median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 3.5 3.5 2 0 0
2023 5.4 5.4 3 0 0
2022 4.1 0.0 2 0 0
2021 8.7 8.7 4 0 0
2020 7.1 1.8 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332312 · GA · Lithia Springs

1,491 Bars, concrete reinforcing, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 14,941 rated employers in Georgia with headcount on file · 122 employers in Lithia Springs, GA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Jeffords Steel and Engineering Company - Potsdam 5.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Mathewson Lane 5.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR CMC Rebar Slidell 5.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Plant 1 5.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE CAO1-Corteva 53 FTE
STATE-SIZE B&W Robinson, LLC 53 FTE
STATE-SIZE Pike Creek Turf, Inc. 53 FTE
STATE-SIZE Coweta Greenhouses, Inc. 53 FTE
CITY-NEAR Silver Line Building Products 897 FTE
CITY-NEAR Home Chef - Skyview 673 FTE
CITY-NEAR GA-LITHI02 671 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lithia Springs, GA - Sydney Ct 655 FTE
NAT-TCR Metal Sales MC - Woodland 5.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Cadillac Products Packaging Company Paris Plant 5.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Carlie C's IGA #765 5.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Lexington Operator LLC 5.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE McAllen Warehouse 53 FTE
NAT-SIZE Alton Manufacturing Inc 53 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sierra Bravo Contractors LLC 53 FTE
NAT-SIZE WB Industries 53 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.