Substation and switching station, power transmission line, construction · Oregon

Wilson Construction Co.

Canby, OR · ~552 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
1.6
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
5
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Wilson Construction Co. runs at 58% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Substation and switching station, power transmission line, construction workplace, earning a grade B.

Wilson Construction Co.: 1.6 TCR = 58% of Substation and switching station, power transmission line, construction BLS 2.8 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Wilson Construction Co. safety composite

Wilson Construction Co. scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 57% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 0%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

37/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 1.62 per 100 workers

Safer than 57% of industry peers

DART rate
D 0.95 per 100 workers

Safer than 40% of industry peers

Fatalities
F 5

Safer than 0% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Wilson Construction Co. held a steady TCR band

Wilson Construction Co.'s TCR held near 0.3 from 1.7 in 2018 to 1.4 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2019 at 2.5 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.59× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=1.7 · 2019=2.5 · 2020=1.0 · 2021=1.3 · 2022=1.8 · 2023=1.6 · 2024=1.4

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 237130 · Canby, OR AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 1.6 · 58% of ind

  • DART 0.9 DART
  • RANK #12/28
  • PHOTO Eastern Service Area
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 77 inj
  • SIZE ~552 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Eastern Service Area (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Oregon employers → · Look up another →

Wilson Construction Co. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Wilson Construction Co. averages 1.6 TCR (58% of the Substation and switching station, power transmission line, construction BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Wilson Construction Co. TCR series: 2018=1.7 · 2019=2.5 · 2020=1 · 2021=1.3 · 2022=1.8 · 2023=1.6 · 2024=1.4 · BLS 2.8

Where Wilson Construction Co. falls in its industry

1,605 Substation and switching stati establishments

Safer than 57% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Oregon alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #12 safest of 28 Substation and switching stati employers in Oregon.

Wilson Construction Co. (552 employees, TCR 1.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 74 employees and a TCR of 2.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Wilson Construction Co.
Wilson Construction Co. (552 employees, TCR 1.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 74 employees and a TCR of 2.0

Wilson Construction Co. has more employees than the Substation and switching station, power median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.4 0.9 12 0 2
2023 1.6 0.7 12 0 0
2022 1.8 0.8 11 0 0
2021 1.3 0.6 8 0 0
2020 1.0 0.2 6 0 2
2019 2.5 0.8 17 1 1
2018 1.7 0.8 11 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

237130 · OR · Canby

1,605 Substation and switching station, power transmission line, construction employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 8,031 rated employers in Oregon with headcount on file · 44 employers in Canby, OR · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Eastern Service Area 1.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR B. Frank Joy LLC 1.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Diversified Utility Services, Inc. 1.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR The Fishel Company 1.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Merlo 551 FTE
STATE-SIZE OR363 PROVIDENCE NEWBERG MEDICAL CTR-NEWBERG H 553 FTE
STATE-SIZE HERMISTON OR 550 FTE
STATE-SIZE Pacific Foods 549 FTE
CITY-NEAR Coho Distributing LLC - Canby 317 FTE
CITY-NEAR 701-00651 271 FTE
CITY-NEAR Johnson Controls Inc. 235 FTE
CITY-NEAR Portland OR 213 FTE
NAT-TCR First Service Mechanical 1.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Crosby McKissick 1.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Deer Park Lumber Co Ltd 1.6 TCR
NAT-TCR P&D Electric, Inc. 1.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE 1101 Enterprise Dr Royersford PA 552 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hendrick Medical Center Brownwood 552 FTE
NAT-SIZE Cedartown 552 FTE
NAT-SIZE Gotham Greens LLC 552 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.