Construction · Minnesota

Wind Energy Group

Minneapolis, MN · ~94 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.3
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Wind Energy Group runs at 12% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Construction workplace, earning a grade A.

Wind Energy Group: 0.3 TCR = 12% of Construction BLS 2.8 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Wind Energy Group safety composite

Wind Energy Group scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 93% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 45%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

66/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.34 per 100 workers

Safer than 93% of industry peers

DART rate
D 0.69 per 100 workers

Safer than 45% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Wind Energy Group: 0.0 → 0.7 TCR

Peak year 2020 @ 0.7 TCR · DART/TCR 2.03× in 2020

Wind Energy Group's TCR rose 0.7 from 0.0 in 2017 to 0.7 in 2020. In 2020, DART was 2.03× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 237130 · Minneapolis, MN AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.3 · 12% of ind

  • DART 0.7 DART
  • RANK #1/38
  • PHOTO Pike Telecom and Ren…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~94 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Pike Telecom and Renewables Massachuttes Statewide Operations (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Wind Energy Group in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Wind Energy Group averages 0.3 TCR (12% of the Construction BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Wind Energy Group TCR series: 2017=0 · 2020=0.7 · BLS 2.8

Where Wind Energy Group falls in its industry

1,605 Construction establishments

Safer than 93% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #1 safest of 38 Construction employers in Minnesota.

Wind Energy Group (94 employees, TCR 0.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 74 employees and a TCR of 2.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Wind Energy Group
Wind Energy Group (94 employees, TCR 0.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 74 employees and a TCR of 2.0

Wind Energy Group has more employees than the Construction median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 0.7 0.7 1 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

237130 · MN · Minneapolis

1,605 Construction employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 1,321 employers in Minneapolis, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Pike Telecom and Renewables Massachuttes Statewide Operations 0.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Palmer Rail Mill 0.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Cobalt Civil, LLC 0.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR TESSCO Midessa 0.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Puris Dawson 94 FTE
STATE-SIZE ARYZTA - Chaska 94 FTE
STATE-SIZE Beacon Promotions Inc 94 FTE
STATE-SIZE Genova-Minnesota, Inc. 94 FTE
CITY-NEAR University of Minnesota Twin Cities 22,522 FTE
CITY-NEAR MN950 MN TELECOMMUTER 12,021 FTE
CITY-NEAR 0501 - City Center 8,459 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hennepin County Medical Center 7,030 FTE
NAT-TCR All Native Managed Services 0.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Levity Entertainment Group 0.3 TCR
NAT-TCR MMP - 49 Spring St. Scarborough 0.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Manzanita Monterey 0.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Bedford 94 FTE
NAT-SIZE National Fuel Gas Distribution Tonawanda Servicenter 94 FTE
NAT-SIZE S03993 - WM of Pittsburgh 94 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sturdevant Companies - 50 SAE Warehouse 94 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.