Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · Oregon

Windsong at Eola Hills

Salem, OR · ~47 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
14.9
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Windsong at Eola Hills runs at 392% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Windsong at Eola Hills: 14.9 TCR = 392% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Windsong at Eola Hills safety composite

Windsong at Eola Hills scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 4%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

19/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 14.89 per 100 workers

Safer than 13% of industry peers

DART rate
F 19.83 per 100 workers

Safer than 4% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Windsong at Eola Hills: 13.0 → 19.8 TCR

Peak year 2020 @ 24.5 TCR · DART/TCR 1.33× in 2023

Windsong at Eola Hills's TCR rose 6.8 from 13.0 in 2019 to 19.8 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2020 at 24.5 TCR. In 2023, DART was 1.33× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Salem, OR ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 14.9 · 392% of ind

  • DART 19.8 DART
  • RANK #166/218
  • PHOTO Pine Grove Senior Li…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 18 inj
  • SIZE ~47 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Pine Grove Senior Living (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Oregon employers → · Look up another →

Windsong at Eola Hills in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Windsong at Eola Hills averages 14.9 TCR (392% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Windsong at Eola Hills TCR series: 2019=13 · 2020=24.5 · 2022=2.2 · 2023=19.8 · BLS 3.8

Where Windsong at Eola Hills falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 13% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Oregon alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #166 safest of 218 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Oregon.

Windsong at Eola Hills (47 employees, TCR 14.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Windsong at Eola Hills
Windsong at Eola Hills (47 employees, TCR 14.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Windsong at Eola Hills has fewer employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 19.8 19.8 8 0 0
2022 2.2 2.2 2 0 0
2020 24.5 19.6 2 8 0
2019 13.0 13.0 6 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · OR · Salem

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 8,031 rated employers in Oregon with headcount on file · 471 employers in Salem, OR · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Pine Grove Senior Living 14.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR KRE-BSL HUSKY CARDINAL DRIVE OPERATION LLC 14.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Peregrine Senior Living - Crimson Ridge Meadows 14.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR The Bridge @ Mt Vernon 14.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE 00463 ROSEBURG CUST SVC CNTR 47 FTE
STATE-SIZE Salem Electric 47 FTE
STATE-SIZE Northern Operations Center 47 FTE
STATE-SIZE Pahlisch Commercial Inc 47 FTE
CITY-NEAR Oregon State Hospital-Salem Campus 2,036 FTE
CITY-NEAR North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : PDX7 1,559 FTE
CITY-NEAR Chemeketa Community College 1,551 FTE
CITY-NEAR Human Service Building ODHS 1,402 FTE
NAT-TCR Pine Grove Senior Living 14.9 TCR
NAT-TCR ICT Express 14.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Asbury Park Nj (Ocean) 14.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Stamco Industries, Inc. 14.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE National City CA Yard (28th St) 47 FTE
NAT-SIZE Solid Waste management (SWM) 47 FTE
NAT-SIZE Water Administration 47 FTE
NAT-SIZE Saminco Florida 47 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.