Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · Arizona

Windsor Austin House, LLC

Cottonwood, AZ · ~41 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
9.3
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Windsor Austin House, LLC runs at 246% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Windsor Austin House, LLC: 9.3 TCR = 246% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Windsor Austin House, LLC safety composite

Windsor Austin House, LLC scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 84% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 35%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

56/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 9.35 per 100 workers

Safer than 35% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 84% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−13.9

2016→2022

Windsor Austin House, LLC injury rate improved

Windsor Austin House, LLC's TCR fell 13.9 from 17.4 in 2016 to 3.5 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2018 at 23.5 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=17.4 · 2017=5.4 · 2018=23.5 · 2019=1.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=14.7 · 2022=3.5

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Cottonwood, AZ ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 9.3 · 246% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #94/173
  • PHOTO New Friends Memory C…
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 25 inj
  • SIZE ~41 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: New Friends Memory Care, LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Arizona employers → · Look up another →

Windsor Austin House, LLC in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Windsor Austin House, LLC averages 9.3 TCR (246% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Windsor Austin House, LLC TCR series: 2016=17.4 · 2017=5.4 · 2018=23.5 · 2019=1 · 2020=0 · 2021=14.7 · 2022=3.5 · BLS 3.8

Where Windsor Austin House, LLC falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 35% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Arizona alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #94 safest of 173 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Arizona.

Windsor Austin House, LLC (41 employees, TCR 9.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Windsor Austin House, LLC
Windsor Austin House, LLC (41 employees, TCR 9.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Windsor Austin House, LLC has fewer employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 3.5 0.0 1 0 0
2021 14.7 14.7 4 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 1.0 0.3 2 1 0
2018 23.5 11.8 8 0 0
2017 5.4 5.4 2 0 0
2016 17.4 10.9 8 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · AZ · Cottonwood

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 9,594 rated employers in Arizona with headcount on file · 29 employers in Cottonwood, AZ · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR New Friends Memory Care, LLC 9.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Hira LLC DBA Amaran Senior Living 9.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR MBK - Island House 9.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Aegis of Bellevue 9.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Soli Organic Inc. - Arizona 41 FTE
STATE-SIZE SAZ-Casa Grande Office/Operations 0032-FAC11 41 FTE
STATE-SIZE Miramonte Homes 41 FTE
STATE-SIZE Mission Critical (Phoenix) 41 FTE
CITY-NEAR City of Cottonwood 390 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 1299 336 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1299 336 FTE
CITY-NEAR SWY-0017-0017-02052 FAC-02052-COTTONWOOD-AZ 142 FTE
NAT-TCR St. Luke's Easton Campus 9.3 TCR
NAT-TCR 6962-SWY-0029-0029-02596 9.3 TCR
NAT-TCR 517723-Roa-Melrose St 9.3 TCR
NAT-TCR 512202-Covington Po 9.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE (01) LC Location 41 FTE
NAT-SIZE VA-Chantilly 41 FTE
NAT-SIZE 2904-SAS-WY 41 FTE
NAT-SIZE Red Mountain Transportation, LLC 41 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.