Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · California

Windsor Court Assisted Living

Palm Springs, CA · ~50 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
11.6
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Windsor Court Assisted Living runs at 306% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Windsor Court Assisted Living: 11.6 TCR = 306% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Windsor Court Assisted Living safety composite

Windsor Court Assisted Living scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 23%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

37/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 11.63 per 100 workers

Safer than 23% of industry peers

DART rate
D 3.95 per 100 workers

Safer than 44% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−5.7

2017→2022

Windsor Court Assisted Living injury rate improved

Windsor Court Assisted Living's TCR fell 5.7 from 11.7 in 2017 to 5.9 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2021 at 18.7 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0.34× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=11.7 · 2018=8.6 · 2019=15.4 · 2020=9.6 · 2021=18.7 · 2022=5.9

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Palm Springs, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 11.6 · 306% of ind

  • DART 4.0 DART
  • RANK #422/635
  • PHOTO Williamsburg Care Op…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 30 inj
  • SIZE ~50 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Williamsburg Care Operations LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Windsor Court Assisted Living in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Windsor Court Assisted Living averages 11.6 TCR (306% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Windsor Court Assisted Living TCR series: 2017=11.7 · 2018=8.6 · 2019=15.4 · 2020=9.6 · 2021=18.7 · 2022=5.9 · BLS 3.8

Where Windsor Court Assisted Living falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 23% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #422 safest of 635 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in California.

Windsor Court Assisted Living (50 employees, TCR 11.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Windsor Court Assisted Living
Windsor Court Assisted Living (50 employees, TCR 11.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Windsor Court Assisted Living has more employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 5.9 4.0 3 0 0
2021 18.7 16.1 7 0 0
2020 9.6 7.2 4 0 0
2019 15.4 8.8 7 0 0
2018 8.6 8.6 4 0 0
2017 11.7 2.3 5 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · CA · Palm Springs

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 114 employers in Palm Springs, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Williamsburg Care Operations LLC 11.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR 10056 11.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Avamere at Mountain Ridge 11.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Eternal Springs of Gilbert 11.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Jack Bros., Inc. 50 FTE
STATE-SIZE M Three Ranches, LLC 50 FTE
STATE-SIZE Penterman Farming Company 50 FTE
STATE-SIZE Trefethen Farming, LLC 50 FTE
CITY-NEAR Desert Regional Medical Center 2,585 FTE
CITY-NEAR 694 DESERT REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER 2,399 FTE
CITY-NEAR 4701-694 2,273 FTE
CITY-NEAR City of Palm Springs 459 FTE
NAT-TCR PatientCare EMS SD 11.6 TCR
NAT-TCR 1855-AHSCM21 11.6 TCR
NAT-TCR 270702-Biloxi Po 11.6 TCR
NAT-TCR 381688-Cle-Rocky River Br 11.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Windsor Encanto Palms 50 FTE
NAT-SIZE Plainfield, IN 50 FTE
NAT-SIZE HG780 50 FTE
NAT-SIZE Willowbend 50 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.