Skilled nursing facilities · California

Windsor Gardens Care Center of Hayward

Hayward, CA · ~85 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
11.3
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Windsor Gardens Care Center of Hayward runs at 174% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Skilled nursing facilities workplace, earning a grade D.

Windsor Gardens Care Center of Hayward: 11.3 TCR = 174% of Skilled nursing facilities BLS 6.5 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Windsor Gardens Care Center of Hayward safety composite

Windsor Gardens Care Center of Hayward scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 18%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

28/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 11.29 per 100 workers

Safer than 22% of industry peers

DART rate
F 9.18 per 100 workers

Safer than 18% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Windsor Gardens Care Center of Hayward: 14.1 → 18.4 TCR

Peak year 2022 @ 18.4 TCR · DART/TCR 0.81× in 2022

Windsor Gardens Care Center of Hayward's TCR rose 4.3 from 14.1 in 2017 to 18.4 in 2022. In 2022, DART was 0.81× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623110 · Hayward, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 11.3 · 174% of ind

  • DART 9.2 DART
  • RANK #539/739
  • PHOTO Mansfield Memorial H…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 45 inj
  • SIZE ~85 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Mansfield Memorial Homes (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Windsor Gardens Care Center of Hayward in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Windsor Gardens Care Center of Hayward averages 11.3 TCR (174% of the Skilled nursing facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Windsor Gardens Care Center of Hayward TCR series: 2017=14.1 · 2018=11.8 · 2019=11.3 · 2020=9.8 · 2021=2.5 · 2022=18.4 · BLS 6.5

Where Windsor Gardens Care Center of Hayward falls in its industry

15,252 Skilled nursing facilities establishments

Safer than 22% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #539 safest of 739 Skilled nursing facilities employers in California.

Windsor Gardens Care Center of Hayward (85 employees, TCR 11.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Windsor Gardens Care Center of Hayward
Windsor Gardens Care Center of Hayward (85 employees, TCR 11.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6

Windsor Gardens Care Center of Hayward has fewer employees than the Skilled nursing facilities median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 18.4 9.2 10 0 0
2021 2.5 2.5 3 0 0
2020 9.8 1.6 6 0 0
2019 11.3 4.2 8 0 0
2018 11.8 5.9 8 0 0
2017 14.1 9.8 10 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623110 · CA · Hayward

15,252 Skilled nursing facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 336 employers in Hayward, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Mansfield Memorial Homes 11.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Buffalo Prairie Center for Rehab and Healthcare 11.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR The Laurels of GreenTree Ridge 11.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR The Woodleigh of Baton Rouge 11.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Gallo Vineyards, Inc. 85 FTE
STATE-SIZE Roche Brothers Inc. 85 FTE
STATE-SIZE Village Nurseries Pauma Valley Yard 85 FTE
STATE-SIZE Sunlet Nursery, Inc. 85 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 518 2,891 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 100 2,817 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 117 2,817 FTE
CITY-NEAR St Rose Hospital 929 FTE
NAT-TCR Valley Truck Parts - Grand Rapids W1 11.3 TCR
NAT-TCR 358900-Wappingers Falls Po 11.3 TCR
NAT-TCR 161644-Clinton Po 11.3 TCR
NAT-TCR 544327-Lake Stevens Carrier Anx 11.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Pittsburgh Blue, Maple Grove 85 FTE
NAT-SIZE Windsor Maryland Gardens 85 FTE
NAT-SIZE Vibra Rehabilitation Hospital of Denver, LLC 85 FTE
NAT-SIZE Columbus 85 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.