Academies, elementary or secondary · Minnesota

Winona Area Learning Center

Winona, MN · ~22 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
2.0
Avg TCR
1.4
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Winona Area Learning Center runs at 143% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Academies, elementary or secondary workplace, earning a grade D.

Winona Area Learning Center: 2.0 TCR = 143% of Academies, elementary or secondary BLS 1.4 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Winona Area Learning Center safety composite

Winona Area Learning Center scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 79% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

71/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 2 per 100 workers

Safer than 77% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 79% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Winona Area Learning Center held a steady TCR band

Winona Area Learning Center's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2022 at 14.0 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=0.0 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=14.0 · 2023=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 611110 · Winona, MN ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 2.0 · 143% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #383/1589
  • PHOTO Robertsville Middle …
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~22 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Robertsville Middle School (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Winona Area Learning Center in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Winona Area Learning Center averages 2.0 TCR (143% of the Academies, elementary or secondary BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Winona Area Learning Center TCR series: 2017=0 · 2018=0 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=14 · 2023=0 · BLS 1.4

Where Winona Area Learning Center falls in its industry

3,374 Academies, elementary or secon establishments

Safer than 77% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #383 safest of 1589 Academies, elementary or secon employers in Minnesota.

Winona Area Learning Center (22 employees, TCR 2.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 76 employees and a TCR of 3.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02,0004,0006,0008,00010,000 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Winona Area Learning Center
Winona Area Learning Center (22 employees, TCR 2.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 76 employees and a TCR of 3.8

Winona Area Learning Center has fewer employees than the Academies, elementary or secondary median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 14.0 14.0 2 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

611110 · MN · Winona

3,374 Academies, elementary or secondary employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 149 employers in Winona, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Robertsville Middle School 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR CREC CENTRAL OFFICE 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Farmington ISD #192-High School/District Office 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Kennedy Secondary School 2.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Sunrise Dairy 22 FTE
STATE-SIZE Emerald Spring Dairy, Inc. 22 FTE
STATE-SIZE Silverstreak Dairy LLC, Greenstreak Dairy 22 FTE
STATE-SIZE Dassel 22 FTE
CITY-NEAR Minnesota State Winona State University 1,635 FTE
CITY-NEAR Winona Health Services 935 FTE
CITY-NEAR Winona State University 734 FTE
CITY-NEAR Saint Mary's University of Minnesota - Winona 731 FTE
NAT-TCR Market Basket #80 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Landmark Builders, Inc. 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Hopper Mechanical 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR OrePac Building Products - Corporate 2.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Morse Rubber 22 FTE
NAT-SIZE King of Prussia - Plaza, Court and Pavilion 22 FTE
NAT-SIZE Atlantic Aviation - MCO 22 FTE
NAT-SIZE HDM Transportation 22 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.