Air-conditioning system (except window) installation · Minnesota

Winona Heating & Ventilating

Winona, MN · ~140 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
6.3
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Winona Heating & Ventilating runs at 223% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Air-conditioning system (except window) installation workplace, earning a grade F.

Winona Heating & Ventilating: 6.3 TCR = 223% of Air-conditioning system (except window) installation BLS 2.8 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Winona Heating & Ventilating safety composite

Winona Heating & Ventilating scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 26%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

33/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 6.25 per 100 workers

Safer than 26% of industry peers

DART rate
F 3.07 per 100 workers

Safer than 28% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.9

2017→2021

Winona Heating & Ventilating injury rate improved

Winona Heating & Ventilating's TCR fell 3.9 from 8.5 in 2017 to 4.6 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2018 at 10.1 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0.49× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=8.5 · 2018=10.1 · 2019=5.8 · 2020=2.2 · 2021=4.6

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238220 · Winona, MN ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 6.3 · 223% of ind

  • DART 3.1 DART
  • RANK #88/153
  • PHOTO Chesapeake Climate C…
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 43 inj
  • SIZE ~140 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Chesapeake Climate Control, LLC. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Winona Heating & Ventilating in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Winona Heating & Ventilating averages 6.3 TCR (223% of the Air-conditioning system (except window) installation BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Winona Heating & Ventilating TCR series: 2017=8.5 · 2018=10.1 · 2019=5.8 · 2020=2.2 · 2021=4.6 · BLS 2.8

Where Winona Heating & Ventilating falls in its industry

5,793 Air-conditioning system (excep establishments

Safer than 26% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #88 safest of 153 Air-conditioning system (excep employers in Minnesota.

Winona Heating & Ventilating (140 employees, TCR 6.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 60 employees and a TCR of 3.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Winona Heating & Ventilating
Winona Heating & Ventilating (140 employees, TCR 6.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 60 employees and a TCR of 3.3

Winona Heating & Ventilating has more employees than the Air-conditioning system (except window) median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 4.6 3.1 6 0 0
2020 2.2 0.7 3 0 0
2019 5.8 1.9 9 0 0
2018 10.1 2.2 14 0 0
2017 8.5 0.8 11 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238220 · MN · Winona

5,793 Air-conditioning system (except window) installation employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 149 employers in Winona, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Chesapeake Climate Control, LLC. 6.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR CHC Mechnical Contractors, Inc. 6.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Loveland One Hour Heating and Air 6.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR 1.4 6.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Lake Country Power 140 FTE
STATE-SIZE Branding Iron Holdings 140 FTE
STATE-SIZE Cameron's Coffee and Distribution Company 140 FTE
STATE-SIZE Villaume Industries, Inc. 140 FTE
CITY-NEAR Minnesota State Winona State University 1,635 FTE
CITY-NEAR Winona Health Services 935 FTE
CITY-NEAR Winona State University 734 FTE
CITY-NEAR Saint Mary's University of Minnesota - Winona 731 FTE
NAT-TCR Central Freight Lines - Knoxville TN 6.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Surgical Management Partners, LLC 6.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Main Office - 01 6.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Dothan Warehouse Freezer Storage 6.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE FE Moran Fire Protection Northern Illinois 140 FTE
NAT-SIZE Walters MBZ 140 FTE
NAT-SIZE Alamo Group (TX) Inc. 140 FTE
NAT-SIZE Bristol Farms Santa Monica 140 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.