COMMERCIAL FLEXOGRAPHIC PRINTING · Illinois

Winpak Heat Seal Corporation

Pekin, IL · ~201 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.3
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Winpak Heat Seal Corporation runs at 38% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical COMMERCIAL FLEXOGRAPHIC PRINTING workplace, earning a grade A.

Winpak Heat Seal Corporation: 1.3 TCR = 38% of COMMERCIAL FLEXOGRAPHIC PRINTING BLS 3.3 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Winpak Heat Seal Corporation safety composite

Winpak Heat Seal Corporation scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 81% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

65/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.27 per 100 workers

Safer than 81% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0.43 per 100 workers

Safer than 58% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.7

2016→2024

Winpak Heat Seal Corporation injury rate improved

Winpak Heat Seal Corporation's TCR fell 2.7 from 3.1 in 2016 to 0.4 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2016 at 3.1 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.34× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=3.1 · 2017=1.9 · 2018=0.9 · 2019=1.8 · 2020=1.3 · 2021=0.4 · 2022=0.4 · 2023=1.3 · 2024=0.4

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 323111 · Pekin, IL AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 1.3 · 38% of ind

  • DART 0.4 DART
  • RANK #31/145
  • PHOTO CSG Crawfordville DDC
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 25 inj
  • SIZE ~201 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: CSG Crawfordville DDC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Illinois employers → · Look up another →

Winpak Heat Seal Corporation in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Winpak Heat Seal Corporation averages 1.3 TCR (38% of the COMMERCIAL FLEXOGRAPHIC PRINTING BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Winpak Heat Seal Corporation TCR series: 2016=3.1 · 2017=1.9 · 2018=0.9 · 2019=1.8 · 2020=1.3 · 2021=0.4 · 2022=0.4 · 2023=1.3 · 2024=0.4 · BLS 3.3

Where Winpak Heat Seal Corporation falls in its industry

2,001 COMMERCIAL FLEXOGRAPHIC PRINTI establishments

Safer than 81% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Illinois alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #31 safest of 145 COMMERCIAL FLEXOGRAPHIC PRINTI employers in Illinois.

Winpak Heat Seal Corporation (201 employees, TCR 1.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 76 employees and a TCR of 2.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Winpak Heat Seal Corporation
Winpak Heat Seal Corporation (201 employees, TCR 1.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 76 employees and a TCR of 2.6

Winpak Heat Seal Corporation has more employees than the COMMERCIAL FLEXOGRAPHIC PRINTING median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.4 0.4 1 0 0
2023 1.3 1.3 3 0 0
2022 0.4 0.4 1 0 0
2021 0.4 0.4 1 0 0
2020 1.3 0.8 3 0 0
2019 1.8 1.8 4 0 0
2018 0.9 0.9 2 0 0
2017 1.9 1.4 4 0 0
2016 3.1 2.6 6 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

323111 · IL · Pekin

2,001 COMMERCIAL FLEXOGRAPHIC PRINTING employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,804 rated employers in Illinois with headcount on file · 84 employers in Pekin, IL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR CSG Crawfordville DDC 1.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR St. Louis Tag Co., Inc. 1.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR DARWILL HILLSIDE 1.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Cenveo - San Antonio 1.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE City of Chicago - CDOT, Main 2 201 FTE
STATE-SIZE Flex-N-Gate Plastics 201 FTE
STATE-SIZE 2967-IL192 201 FTE
STATE-SIZE OPTO International, Inc. 201 FTE
CITY-NEAR Federal Correctional Institution - Staff and Inmates 1,380 FTE
CITY-NEAR Pekin Hospital 420 FTE
CITY-NEAR 603 367 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 603 351 FTE
NAT-TCR TNT Crane & Rigging - Ft. Worth Branch 1.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Kirby-Smith Machinery 1.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Bu# 601 1.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Bu# 113 1.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Kraft North Assembly & Distribution 201 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sky Climber Renewables 201 FTE
NAT-SIZE Dallas Office 201 FTE
NAT-SIZE JCB 201 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.