General Freight Trucking, Long Distance, Truckload · Florida

Winter Haven CTS

Winter Haven, FL · ~66 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
2.0
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Winter Haven CTS runs at 44% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical General Freight Trucking, Long Distance, Truckload workplace, earning a grade A.

Winter Haven CTS: 2.0 TCR = 44% of General Freight Trucking, Long Distance, Truckload BLS 4.5 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Winter Haven CTS safety composite

Winter Haven CTS scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 70% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 53%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

61/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2 per 100 workers

Safer than 70% of industry peers

DART rate
C 1.75 per 100 workers

Safer than 55% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 53% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Winter Haven CTS: 0.0 → 1.8 TCR

Peak year 2019 @ 4.9 TCR · DART/TCR 0.88× in 2024

Winter Haven CTS's TCR rose 1.8 from 0.0 in 2016 to 1.8 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2019 at 4.9 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.88× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 484121 · Winter Haven, FL AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 2.0 · 44% of ind

  • DART 1.8 DART
  • RANK #34/110
  • PHOTO FTC Transportation
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 14 inj
  • SIZE ~66 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: FTC Transportation (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Florida employers → · Look up another →

Winter Haven CTS in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Winter Haven CTS averages 2.0 TCR (44% of the General Freight Trucking, Long Distance, Truckload BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Winter Haven CTS TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=0 · 2018=2 · 2019=4.9 · 2020=0 · 2021=2.7 · 2022=4.6 · 2023=2 · 2024=1.8 · BLS 4.5

Where Winter Haven CTS falls in its industry

3,252 General Freight Trucking, Long establishments

Safer than 70% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Florida alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #34 safest of 110 General Freight Trucking, Long employers in Florida.

Winter Haven CTS (66 employees, TCR 2.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 61 employees and a TCR of 3.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Winter Haven CTS
Winter Haven CTS (66 employees, TCR 2.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 61 employees and a TCR of 3.0

Winter Haven CTS has more employees than the General Freight Trucking, Long Distance, median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.8 1.8 2 0 0
2023 2.0 0.0 2 0 0
2022 4.6 2.3 4 0 0
2021 2.7 1.4 2 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 4.9 4.9 3 0 0
2018 2.0 2.0 1 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

484121 · FL · Winter Haven

3,252 General Freight Trucking, Long Distance, Truckload employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 26,569 rated employers in Florida with headcount on file · 128 employers in Winter Haven, FL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR FTC Transportation 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR LAKE CHARLES TERMINAL 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Unimex Freight 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Shieldwall Solutions GA Inc. 2.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Green Bean Packers, Inc. 66 FTE
STATE-SIZE PPE Plant Port Everglades 66 FTE
STATE-SIZE MTN STN STU Storeroom 66 FTE
STATE-SIZE Clark Service Center 66 FTE
CITY-NEAR Winter Haven Hospital, Inc. (6100) 2,652 FTE
CITY-NEAR LEGOLAND Florida Resort 1,424 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 6071 897 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6071 860 FTE
NAT-TCR Bainbridge Terminal Services, LLC 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Hilco Transport Wilmington 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR USA TN Memphis Plant 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Jem, LLC 2.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE G Mechanical, Inc. 66 FTE
NAT-SIZE Vistar Rocky Mountain - 1003 66 FTE
NAT-SIZE Mrs. Bush's Personal Care Homes, Inc. 66 FTE
NAT-SIZE Presleys' Theater 66 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.