Low voltage electrical work · Indiana

Wired Communications, LLC

Fort Wayne, IN · ~28 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.0
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Wired Communications, LLC runs at 73% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Low voltage electrical work workplace, earning a grade B.

Wired Communications, LLC: 2.0 TCR = 73% of Low voltage electrical work BLS 2.8 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Wired Communications, LLC safety composite

Wired Communications, LLC scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 78% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

63/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.05 per 100 workers

Safer than 57% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 78% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−5.0

2016→2024

Wired Communications, LLC injury rate improved

Wired Communications, LLC's TCR fell 5.0 from 5.0 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2016 at 5.0 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=5.0 · 2017=0.0 · 2018=3.8 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=3.3 · 2022=3.6 · 2023=2.8 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238210 · Fort Wayne, IN AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 2.0 · 73% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #41/63
  • PHOTO Liberty Electric LLC
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 5 inj
  • SIZE ~28 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Liberty Electric LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Indiana employers → · Look up another →

Wired Communications, LLC in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Wired Communications, LLC averages 2.0 TCR (73% of the Low voltage electrical work BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Wired Communications, LLC TCR series: 2016=5 · 2017=0 · 2018=3.8 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=3.3 · 2022=3.6 · 2023=2.8 · 2024=0 · BLS 2.8

Where Wired Communications, LLC falls in its industry

4,550 Low voltage electrical work establishments

Safer than 57% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Indiana alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #41 safest of 63 Low voltage electrical work employers in Indiana.

Wired Communications, LLC (28 employees, TCR 2.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 63 employees and a TCR of 2.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Wired Communications, LLC
Wired Communications, LLC (28 employees, TCR 2.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 63 employees and a TCR of 2.5

Wired Communications, LLC has fewer employees than the Low voltage electrical work median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 2.8 2.8 1 0 0
2022 3.6 3.6 1 0 0
2021 3.3 3.3 1 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 3.8 0.0 1 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 5.0 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238210 · IN · Fort Wayne

4,550 Low voltage electrical work employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,750 rated employers in Indiana with headcount on file · 634 employers in Fort Wayne, IN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Liberty Electric LLC 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR TELENET VOIP, INC. 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Staples Energy-Sacramento 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Century Electric LLC 2.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Eagle Valley CCGT 28 FTE
STATE-SIZE Shelbyville District Office 28 FTE
STATE-SIZE Decatur County REMC 28 FTE
STATE-SIZE CenterPoint Energy - Columbus 28 FTE
CITY-NEAR Parkview Memorial Hospital 6,096 FTE
CITY-NEAR Parkview North Hospital 4,648 FTE
CITY-NEAR Parkview Corporate Office 3,312 FTE
CITY-NEAR Shambaugh & Son LP 3,072 FTE
NAT-TCR Ahern Fond du Lac - Corporate 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Whse 0 Seffner - #01 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Home 2 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Kings Mountain (FSFT) 2.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE CITGO Linden Terminal 28 FTE
NAT-SIZE FCL Builders Maryland, LLC 28 FTE
NAT-SIZE Phase Six Moving 28 FTE
NAT-SIZE Dormark Construction Co. 28 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.