Executive offices, federal, state, and local (e.g., governor, mayor, president) · California

Wireless Communications

Long Beach, CA · ~139 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.6
Avg TCR
3.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Wireless Communications runs at 18% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Executive offices, federal, state, and local (e.g., governor, mayor, president) workplace, earning a grade A.

Wireless Communications: 0.6 TCR = 18% of Executive offices, federal, state, and local (e.g., governor, mayor, president) BLS 3.2 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Wireless Communications safety composite

Wireless Communications scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 91% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 52%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

78/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.57 per 100 workers

Safer than 91% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 82% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.7

2017→2019

Wireless Communications injury rate improved

Wireless Communications's TCR fell 1.7 from 1.7 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2019. Peak filing year was 2017 at 1.7 TCR. In 2019, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=1.7 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 921110 · Long Beach, CA AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 0.6 · 18% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #61/149
  • PHOTO Fire Station 11
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~139 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Fire Station 11 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Wireless Communications in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Wireless Communications averages 0.6 TCR (18% of the Executive offices, federal, state, and local (e.g., governor, mayor, president) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Wireless Communications TCR series: 2017=1.7 · 2018=0 · 2019=0 · BLS 3.2

Where Wireless Communications falls in its industry

1,010 Executive offices, federal, st establishments

Safer than 91% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #61 safest of 149 Executive offices, federal, st employers in California.

Wireless Communications (139 employees, TCR 0.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 130 employees and a TCR of 4.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Wireless Communications
Wireless Communications (139 employees, TCR 0.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 130 employees and a TCR of 4.8

Wireless Communications has more employees than the Executive offices, federal, state, and l median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 1.7 0.6 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

921110 · CA · Long Beach

1,010 Executive offices, federal, state, and local (e.g., governor, mayor, president) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 614 employers in Long Beach, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Fire Station 11 0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Fire Station 17 0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Code Enforcement 0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Belmont Plaza Pool 0.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE PV Farming Operations, LLC 139 FTE
STATE-SIZE SVL - 01 139 FTE
STATE-SIZE Alexander Labor Inc 139 FTE
STATE-SIZE CA-Antelope Valley S/C 139 FTE
CITY-NEAR Memorialcare Long Beach Medical Center 3,755 FTE
CITY-NEAR LBM00 LONG BEACH MEMORIAL MED CENTER 3,552 FTE
CITY-NEAR Total Terminals International, LLC. 2,683 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 300 2,621 FTE
NAT-TCR Methodist Hospital Subsidiaries 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR CIN 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Bison Energy Services LLC 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Arris 2 0.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Champion Strattanville 139 FTE
NAT-SIZE Blanchard Machinery Company - Columbia Heavy 139 FTE
NAT-SIZE Rudolph Foods Lima Plant 139 FTE
NAT-SIZE 641 - Beachwood 139 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.