Guard dog training services · Wisconsin

Wisconsin Humane Society - Racine Campus

Mount Pleasant, WI · ~25 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
7.4
Avg TCR
2.1
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Wisconsin Humane Society - Racine Campus runs at 354% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Guard dog training services workplace, earning a grade F.

Wisconsin Humane Society - Racine Campus: 7.4 TCR = 354% of Guard dog training services BLS 2.1 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Wisconsin Humane Society - Racine Campus safety composite

Wisconsin Humane Society - Racine Campus scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 77% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

61/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 7.44 per 100 workers

Safer than 77% of industry peers

DART rate
D 4.81 per 100 workers

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Wisconsin Humane Society - Racine Campus: 0.0 → 14.4 TCR

Peak year 2023 @ 15.3 TCR · DART/TCR 0.65× in 2024

Wisconsin Humane Society - Racine Campus's TCR rose 14.4 from 0.0 in 2020 to 14.4 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 15.3 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.65× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 812910 · Mount Pleasant, WI ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 7.4 · 354% of ind

  • DART 4.8 DART
  • RANK #2/5
  • PHOTO South East Region
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 6 inj
  • SIZE ~25 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: South East Region (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Wisconsin employers → · Look up another →

Wisconsin Humane Society - Racine Campus in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Wisconsin Humane Society - Racine Campus averages 7.4 TCR (354% of the Guard dog training services BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Wisconsin Humane Society - Racine Campus TCR series: 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2023=15.3 · 2024=14.4 · BLS 2.1

Where Wisconsin Humane Society - Racine Campus falls in its industry

65 Guard dog training services establishments

Safer than 77% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 15.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Wisconsin alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #2 safest of 5 Guard dog training services employers in Wisconsin.

Wisconsin Humane Society - Racine Campus (25 employees, TCR 7.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 47 employees and a TCR of 15.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 010203040 Average employees Total Case Rate Wisconsin Humane Society - Racine Campus
Wisconsin Humane Society - Racine Campus (25 employees, TCR 7.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 47 employees and a TCR of 15.8

Wisconsin Humane Society - Racine Campus has fewer employees than the Guard dog training services median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 15.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 14.4 4.8 3 0 0
2023 15.3 5.1 3 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

812910 · WI · Mount Pleasant

65 Guard dog training services employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,834 rated employers in Wisconsin with headcount on file · 15 employers in Mount Pleasant, WI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR South East Region 7.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Orange County - Animal Services 7.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Wisconsin Humane Society - Ozaukee Campus 7.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Wayside Waifs 6.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Fergusons Minnesota Harvest LLC 25 FTE
STATE-SIZE Minocqua Service Center 25 FTE
STATE-SIZE Janesville Headquarters 25 FTE
STATE-SIZE Berlin Office 25 FTE
CITY-NEAR Foxconn Industrial Internet 961 FTE
CITY-NEAR SEDA - North America Headquarters 247 FTE
CITY-NEAR Seda North America, Inc. 206 FTE
CITY-NEAR 534-00891 145 FTE
NAT-TCR FLL-GH 7.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Jellystone Park Waller 7.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Mikes Mechanical Services LLC 7.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Amazon.com Services LLC - MCI7 7.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE 2189 Young Drive 25 FTE
NAT-SIZE CNC Cabinetry Inc. 25 FTE
NAT-SIZE Avenue C Glass LLC 25 FTE
NAT-SIZE TriGen Ag Partners LLC 25 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2021, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.