Materials recovery facilities (MRF) · Texas

Wistron GreenTech (Texas) Corporation

Mckinney, TX · ~100 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.3
Avg TCR
2.6
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Wistron GreenTech (Texas) Corporation runs at 166% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Materials recovery facilities (MRF) workplace, earning a grade D.

Wistron GreenTech (Texas) Corporation: 4.3 TCR = 166% of Materials recovery facilities (MRF) BLS 2.6 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Wistron GreenTech (Texas) Corporation safety composite

Wistron GreenTech (Texas) Corporation scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 8%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

33/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 4.31 per 100 workers

Safer than 43% of industry peers

DART rate
F 7.99 per 100 workers

Safer than 8% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Wistron GreenTech (Texas) Corporation: 2.0 → 9.3 TCR

Peak year 2022 @ 9.3 TCR · DART/TCR 1.85× in 2022

Wistron GreenTech (Texas) Corporation's TCR rose 7.4 from 2.0 in 2016 to 9.3 in 2022. In 2022, DART was 1.85× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 562920 · Mckinney, TX ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 4.3 · 166% of ind

  • DART 8.0 DART
  • RANK #27/40
  • PHOTO ReSource Waste Servi…
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 28 inj
  • SIZE ~100 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: ReSource Waste Services - Roxbury (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Wistron GreenTech (Texas) Corporation in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Wistron GreenTech (Texas) Corporation averages 4.3 TCR (166% of the Materials recovery facilities (MRF) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Wistron GreenTech (Texas) Corporation TCR series: 2016=2 · 2017=4.4 · 2018=4.6 · 2019=2.6 · 2020=3.1 · 2021=4.1 · 2022=9.3 · BLS 2.6

Where Wistron GreenTech (Texas) Corporation falls in its industry

422 Materials recovery facilities establishments

Safer than 43% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #27 safest of 40 Materials recovery facilities employers in Texas.

Wistron GreenTech (Texas) Corporation (100 employees, TCR 4.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 44 employees and a TCR of 3.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Wistron GreenTech (Texas) Corporation
Wistron GreenTech (Texas) Corporation (100 employees, TCR 4.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 44 employees and a TCR of 3.8

Wistron GreenTech (Texas) Corporation has more employees than the Materials recovery facilities (MRF) median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 9.3 8.0 5 2 0
2021 4.1 4.1 3 0 0
2020 3.1 3.1 1 3 0
2019 2.6 2.6 4 0 0
2018 4.6 4.6 5 0 0
2017 4.4 1.1 4 0 0
2016 2.0 2.0 6 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

562920 · TX · Mckinney

422 Materials recovery facilities (MRF) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 189 employers in Mckinney, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR ReSource Waste Services - Roxbury 4.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR L&S Demo Recycling, Inc. 4.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR S06563 - Davis St MRF 4.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Casella Recycling Auburn 4.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Revol Greens - TX 100 FTE
STATE-SIZE Dakota Utility Contractors LLC 100 FTE
STATE-SIZE McClung Energy Services, LLC 100 FTE
STATE-SIZE HCI03-FPC 100 FTE
CITY-NEAR Raytheon_McKinney_TX 3,510 FTE
CITY-NEAR Encore Wire 1,510 FTE
CITY-NEAR Medical City McKinney 1,089 FTE
CITY-NEAR North Texas Medical Center GALTEX LLC 1,088 FTE
NAT-TCR T156 4.3 TCR
NAT-TCR INTEGRIS Health Edmond Inc. 4.3 TCR
NAT-TCR RRSC Portland 4.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Jefferson Plant 32 4.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Villa at Lincoln Park 100 FTE
NAT-SIZE Bay Shore Systems, Inc. 100 FTE
NAT-SIZE Superior Grocers #116 100 FTE
NAT-SIZE MN Annual Corporate 100 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.