Machine shops · Georgia

Withers Tool, Die and Manufacturing Co.

Mableton, GA · ~32 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
6.3
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Withers Tool, Die and Manufacturing Co. runs at 190% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Machine shops workplace, earning a grade D.

Withers Tool, Die and Manufacturing Co.: 6.3 TCR = 190% of Machine shops BLS 3.3 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Withers Tool, Die and Manufacturing Co. safety composite

Withers Tool, Die and Manufacturing Co. scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 75% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 22%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

48/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 6.27 per 100 workers

Safer than 22% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 75% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−5.4

2016→2024

Withers Tool, Die and Manufacturing Co. injury rate improved

Withers Tool, Die and Manufacturing Co.'s TCR fell 5.4 from 11.4 in 2016 to 5.9 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2016 at 11.4 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=11.4 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=2.6 · 2020=5.6 · 2021=9.2 · 2022=9.4 · 2023=6.1 · 2024=5.9

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332710 · Mableton, GA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 6.3 · 190% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #23/24
  • PHOTO Butler Tool, Inc.
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 17 inj
  • SIZE ~32 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Butler Tool, Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Georgia employers → · Look up another →

Withers Tool, Die and Manufacturing Co. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Withers Tool, Die and Manufacturing Co. averages 6.3 TCR (190% of the Machine shops BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Withers Tool, Die and Manufacturing Co. TCR series: 2016=11.4 · 2018=0 · 2019=2.6 · 2020=5.6 · 2021=9.2 · 2022=9.4 · 2023=6.1 · 2024=5.9 · BLS 3.3

Where Withers Tool, Die and Manufacturing Co. falls in its industry

1,821 Machine shops establishments

Safer than 22% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Georgia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #23 safest of 24 Machine shops employers in Georgia.

Withers Tool, Die and Manufacturing Co. (32 employees, TCR 6.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 48 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Withers Tool, Die and Manufacturing Co.
Withers Tool, Die and Manufacturing Co. (32 employees, TCR 6.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 48 employees and a TCR of 3.5

Withers Tool, Die and Manufacturing Co. has fewer employees than the Machine shops median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 5.9 0.0 2 0 0
2023 6.1 3.0 2 0 0
2022 9.4 0.0 3 0 0
2021 9.2 0.0 3 0 0
2020 5.6 5.6 2 0 0
2019 2.6 2.6 1 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 11.4 5.7 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332710 · GA · Mableton

1,821 Machine shops employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 14,941 rated employers in Georgia with headcount on file · 42 employers in Mableton, GA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Butler Tool, Inc. 6.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Hydraulics- Pueblo 6.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR PME Cincinnati 6.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR EST Tool & Machine, Inc. 6.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE GQF Manufacturing Co. 32 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hatchery 32 FTE
STATE-SIZE Dahlonega Hatchery 32 FTE
STATE-SIZE South Central Georgia Gin Co. 32 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mable House Barnes Ampitheatre 861 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lonestar Forming, Inc. - Mableton, GA 620 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lonestar-Atlanta 438 FTE
CITY-NEAR Southeastern Traffic Supply, LLC. 304 FTE
NAT-TCR PDK Construction 6.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Adapt/Compass - Jackson Street locations 6.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Kalamazoo Block Plant 6.3 TCR
NAT-TCR St. Louis Lab 6.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE AVSP/Adm 32 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hickory Construction Company 32 FTE
NAT-SIZE Creekside Community High School 32 FTE
NAT-SIZE Gridlock Traffic Systems, Inc. 32 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.