General warehousing and storage · California

Wolverine Worldwide - Distribution Center 52

Beaumont, CA · ~177 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
7.9
Avg TCR
5.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Wolverine Worldwide - Distribution Center 52 runs at 136% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical General warehousing and storage workplace, earning a grade D.

Wolverine Worldwide - Distribution Center 52: 7.9 TCR = 136% of General warehousing and storage BLS 5.8 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Wolverine Worldwide - Distribution Center 52 safety composite

Wolverine Worldwide - Distribution Center 52 scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 16%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

26/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 7.9 per 100 workers

Safer than 16% of industry peers

DART rate
F 5.43 per 100 workers

Safer than 21% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.5

2018→2023

Wolverine Worldwide - Distribution Center 52 injury rate improved

Wolverine Worldwide - Distribution Center 52's TCR fell 0.5 from 6.5 in 2018 to 6.0 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2019 at 13.8 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.69× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=6.5 · 2019=13.8 · 2020=6.7 · 2022=6.5 · 2023=6.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 493110 · Beaumont, CA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 7.9 · 136% of ind

  • DART 5.4 DART
  • RANK #887/1131
  • PHOTO Amazon Transportatio…
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 59 inj
  • SIZE ~177 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Amazon Transportation Services : BFI5 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Wolverine Worldwide - Distribution Center 52 in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Wolverine Worldwide - Distribution Center 52 averages 7.9 TCR (136% of the General warehousing and storage BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Wolverine Worldwide - Distribution Center 52 TCR series: 2018=6.5 · 2019=13.8 · 2020=6.7 · 2022=6.5 · 2023=6 · BLS 5.8

Where Wolverine Worldwide - Distribution Center 52 falls in its industry

9,477 General warehousing and storag establishments

Safer than 16% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #887 safest of 1131 General warehousing and storag employers in California.

Wolverine Worldwide - Distribution Center 52 (177 employees, TCR 7.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Wolverine Worldwide - Distribution Center 52
Wolverine Worldwide - Distribution Center 52 (177 employees, TCR 7.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 3.5

Wolverine Worldwide - Distribution Center 52 has more employees than the General warehousing and storage median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 6.0 5.4 8 3 0
2022 6.5 6.5 10 2 0
2020 6.7 4.2 10 1 0
2019 13.8 11.2 21 0 0
2018 6.5 4.5 10 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

493110 · CA · Beaumont

9,477 General warehousing and storage employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 42 employers in Beaumont, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Amazon Transportation Services : BFI5 7.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Logan Township Distribution Center 7.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR 88707 7.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR WH 21 7.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE The Almond Company LP 177 FTE
STATE-SIZE 1 177 FTE
STATE-SIZE Western Water District 177 FTE
STATE-SIZE Alvarado Water Treatment Plant 177 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - PSP1 3,413 FTE
CITY-NEAR Ono-056 908 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 5156 446 FTE
CITY-NEAR 5156 434 FTE
NAT-TCR Longview, Tx #00061 7.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Homewood at Hanover PA, Inc. 7.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Mt. Vernon Health Care 7.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Big Lots Store #1727 HIGH POINT, NC 7.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Hotwire Communications - Naples 177 FTE
NAT-SIZE USM Store #516 (United) 177 FTE
NAT-SIZE USM Store #532 (United) 177 FTE
NAT-SIZE RA Caters Wash DC 177 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.