Oil and gas field-type drilling machinery and equipment (except offshore floating platforms) manufacturing · Texas

WOM - Canemont

Houston, TX · ~158 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.1
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

WOM - Canemont runs at 93% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Oil and gas field-type drilling machinery and equipment (except offshore floating platforms) manufacturing workplace, earning a grade C.

WOM - Canemont: 3.1 TCR = 93% of Oil and gas field-type drilling machinery and equipment (except offshore floating platforms) manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

WOM - Canemont safety composite

WOM - Canemont scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 12%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

24/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 3.07 per 100 workers

Safer than 18% of industry peers

DART rate
F 2.94 per 100 workers

Safer than 12% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

WOM - Canemont: 1.3 → 2.9 TCR

Peak year 2021 @ 7.9 TCR · DART/TCR 0.96× in 2024

WOM - Canemont's TCR rose 1.6 from 1.3 in 2017 to 2.9 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 7.9 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.96× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 333132 · Houston, TX AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 3.1 · 93% of ind

  • DART 2.9 DART
  • RANK #184/208
  • PHOTO EnQuest Energy Solut…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 38 inj
  • SIZE ~158 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: EnQuest Energy Solutions - Odessa (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

WOM - Canemont in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows WOM - Canemont averages 3.1 TCR (93% of the Oil and gas field-type drilling machinery and equipment (except offshore floating platforms) manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

WOM - Canemont TCR series: 2017=1.3 · 2018=1.4 · 2019=0.6 · 2020=1.2 · 2021=7.9 · 2022=4.7 · 2023=4.6 · 2024=2.9 · BLS 3.3

Where WOM - Canemont falls in its industry

316 Oil and gas field-type drillin establishments

Safer than 18% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #184 safest of 208 Oil and gas field-type drillin employers in Texas.

WOM - Canemont (158 employees, TCR 3.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 1.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,000 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate WOM - Canemont
WOM - Canemont (158 employees, TCR 3.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 1.3

WOM - Canemont has more employees than the Oil and gas field-type drilling machiner median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.9 2.9 4 0 0
2023 4.6 3.3 7 0 0
2022 4.7 3.5 8 0 0
2021 7.9 7.3 12 0 0
2020 1.2 1.2 2 0 0
2019 0.6 0.6 1 0 0
2018 1.4 0.7 2 0 0
2017 1.3 1.3 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

333132 · TX · Houston

316 Oil and gas field-type drilling machinery and equipment (except offshore floating platforms) manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 5,116 employers in Houston, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR EnQuest Energy Solutions - Odessa 3.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Plantersville 3.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Precision International 3.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR GEODynamics Legacy 3.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Wonderful Citrus Texas Farming Operations 158 FTE
STATE-SIZE Crescent Directional Drilling, LP 158 FTE
STATE-SIZE GXA GEXA Energy LP Houston TX 158 FTE
STATE-SIZE Pharr Svc Ctr 158 FTE
CITY-NEAR IAH IAH 11,560 FTE
CITY-NEAR IAH - Airport United Airlines Offices 10,239 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6925-IAH 9,442 FTE
CITY-NEAR Houston Methodist Hospital Texas Medical Center 8,873 FTE
NAT-TCR Associate Engineering Corporation 3.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Elite Growers, Inc. 3.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Turlock Terminal 3.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Specialty Appliances, LLC 3.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Valle Verde FLC 158 FTE
NAT-SIZE TPI Guayama 158 FTE
NAT-SIZE Brookfield 158 FTE
NAT-SIZE The Andersons Inc. - Overland Park 158 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.